• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[185例尿失禁患者的既往史及尿动力学分类]

[Anamnestic and urometric classification of 185 cases of urinary incontinence].

作者信息

Methfessel G, Methfessel H D

出版信息

Zentralbl Gynakol. 1982;104(21):1361-8.

PMID:7164641
Abstract

Standard interviews were obtained from 185 women with urinary incontinence over three years to collect information about their individual complaints. All probands then were urometrically examined. The selection had been by negative criteria, as 40.5 per cent of the women had undergone one or several unsuccessful operations earlier in the past. Information based on case histories was grouped by three categories of complaint; only stress symptoms (n = 66), stress and urge symptoms (n = 116), only urge symptoms (n = 3). The following findings were obtained, in terms of ICS classification, by urometric diagnosis: stress incontinence due to urethral insufficiency (n = 51), stress incontinence with accompanying urge component (n = 72), sensorial urge incontinence (n = 26), motor urge incontinence (n = 16), overflow incontinence (n = 7), no urometric findings (n = 13). Sizeable variation was found to exist by comparison between complaint groups on the basis of case history and groups based on urometric classification. Such discrepancy applied primarily to the grey area of combined stress-urge symptoms from which the majority of bladder-dependent incontinence forms was recorded. Yet, pure stress incontinence, too, signalized genuine urethral insufficiency only in 51 of 66 cases. Hence, even detailed case history can provide only limited information for proper diagnosis.

摘要

在三年时间里,对185名尿失禁女性进行了标准访谈,以收集她们个人投诉的信息。然后对所有先证者进行了尿动力学检查。选择标准为阴性标准,因为40.5%的女性过去曾接受过一次或几次不成功的手术。根据病史信息按三类投诉进行分组;仅压力性症状(n = 66)、压力性和急迫性症状(n = 116)、仅急迫性症状(n = 3)。根据国际尿控学会(ICS)分类,通过尿动力学诊断得出以下结果:尿道功能不全导致的压力性尿失禁(n = 51)、伴有急迫性成分的压力性尿失禁(n = 72)、感觉性急迫性尿失禁(n = 26)、运动性急迫性尿失禁(n = 16)、充溢性尿失禁(n = 7)、无尿动力学检查结果(n = 13)。通过比较基于病史的投诉组和基于尿动力学分类的组,发现存在相当大的差异。这种差异主要适用于压力性和急迫性症状合并的灰色区域,大多数膀胱相关性尿失禁形式都记录在该区域。然而,纯压力性尿失禁在66例中也只有51例显示真正的尿道功能不全。因此,即使是详细的病史也只能为正确诊断提供有限的信息。

相似文献

1
[Anamnestic and urometric classification of 185 cases of urinary incontinence].[185例尿失禁患者的既往史及尿动力学分类]
Zentralbl Gynakol. 1982;104(21):1361-8.
2
Which women with stress incontinence require urodynamic evaluation?哪些压力性尿失禁女性需要进行尿动力学评估?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Jan;184(2):20-7. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.108171.
3
[Detrusor instability--an important but underestimated factor in urinary incontinence in women].逼尿肌不稳定——女性尿失禁中一个重要但被低估的因素
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia). 1998;37(3):23-6.
4
Correlation of Valsalva leak point pressure with subjective degree of stress urinary incontinence in women.女性瓦尔萨尔瓦漏尿点压力与压力性尿失禁主观程度的相关性
J Urol. 1996 Jan;155(1):281-5.
5
[A questionnaire with a new urge-score and stress-score for the evaluation of female urinary incontinence (author's transl)].
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1979 Sep;39(9):784-92.
6
[The correlation of the findings between the urological clinical history and urodynamic evaluation in urinary incontinence].[尿失禁患者泌尿外科临床病史与尿动力学评估结果的相关性]
Ginecol Obstet Mex. 1994 Sep;62:279-81.
7
[FPSUND: a pan-Canadian evaluation of a clinical classification of urinary incontinence].[FPSUND:一项全加拿大范围内对尿失禁临床分类的评估]
Ann Chir. 1998;52(8):722-6.
8
[Experiences with a new questionnaire for preoperative evaluation of female urinary incontinence (author's transl)].
Wien Med Wochenschr. 1981;131(13-14):353-5.
9
Stress incontinence in women. A practical method of evaluation.
J Reprod Med. 1988 Sep;33(9):749-56.
10
Urinary incontinence-assessment in women: stress, urge or both?女性尿失禁评估:压力性、急迫性还是两者皆有?
Aust Fam Physician. 2008 Mar;37(3):112-7.