Suppr超能文献

静脉输注给药时药物的统计矩及稳态分布容积的估算。

Estimation of statistical moments and steady-state volume of distribution for a drug given by intravenous infusion.

作者信息

Chan K K, Gibaldi M

出版信息

J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1982 Oct;10(5):551-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01059037.

Abstract

Although it is generally recognized that estimates of the area under the drug concentration vs. time curve (AUC) after a dose is rather insensitive to curve-fitting procedures, little is known about estimates of mean residence time (MRT) or volume of distribution at steady-state (Vss), both of which can be derived from area estimates. This question is of particular concern when a drug is given as a short-term constant rate i.v. infusion since the infusion phase is often ignored and blood sampling restricted to the postinfusion period. Two nonexperimental methods for approximating concentration data during infusion termed the linear approximation method and the imaginary bolus method were found to be useful under certain conditions. Both methods provide reasonable estimates of AUC and the area under the first moment of the drug concentration-time curve (AUMC) for drugs with a wide range of pharmacokinetic characteristics. The imaginary bolus method was found to be the better of the two for estimation of MRT and to be widely applicable for this purpose. Vss proved to be highly sensitive to the approximation methods; although the imaginary bolus method is superior to the linear approximation method for estimating Vss, it does not work particularly well for drugs with pronounced multicompartment characteristics. In general, accurate estimation of Vss of drugs given by short-term i.v. infusion requires that at least one drug concentration be determined during infusion.

摘要

尽管人们普遍认识到,给药后药物浓度-时间曲线(AUC)下面积的估计值对曲线拟合程序不太敏感,但对于平均驻留时间(MRT)或稳态分布容积(Vss)的估计值却知之甚少,而这两者均可从面积估计值推导得出。当以短期恒速静脉输注方式给药时,这个问题尤其值得关注,因为输注阶段常常被忽略,且血样采集仅限于输注后阶段。发现两种在输注期间近似浓度数据的非实验方法,即线性近似法和虚拟大剂量法,在某些条件下是有用的。对于具有广泛药代动力学特征的药物,这两种方法都能对AUC以及药物浓度-时间曲线一阶矩下的面积(AUMC)提供合理估计。发现虚拟大剂量法在估计MRT方面是两者中较好的方法,并且广泛适用于此目的。事实证明,Vss对近似方法高度敏感;尽管虚拟大剂量法在估计Vss方面优于线性近似法,但对于具有明显多室特征的药物,它的效果并不特别好。一般来说,对于通过短期静脉输注给药的药物,要准确估计其Vss,需要在输注期间至少测定一个药物浓度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验