Rioux J A, Perieres J, Killick-Kendrick R, Lanotte G, Bailly M
Ann Parasitol Hum Comp. 1982;57(6):631-5.
In the analysis of the ecology of foci of leishmaniasis in the South of France, a comparison was made of two methods of sampling the vector: the technique of oiled paper traps and of hand-catching off human bait. The techniques, used in parallel in a rural site (Cévennes) and in an urban site (built up areas in Marseilles) gave comparable results. In the Cévennes focus of visceral leishmaniasis, Phlebotomus ariasi Tonnoir, 1921 is the dominant sandfly; in the urban focus, it is replaced by Phlebotomus perniciosus Newstead, 1911. The analysis of captures shows that, in the South of France, in general, the method of sampling by oiled papers can be used instead of man-biting catches. The former method is easier and permits work over a wide area at many places simultaneously.
在对法国南部利什曼病疫源地生态进行分析时，对两种捕集病媒的方法进行了比较：油纸诱捕法和以人作为诱饵进行人工捕捉法。这两种方法在一个乡村地区（塞文山脉）和一个城市地区（马赛建成区）同时使用，得出了可比的结果。在内脏利什曼病的塞文疫源地，1921年的阿里亚斯白蛉是主要的白蛉种类；在城市疫源地，则被1911年的有害白蛉所取代。对捕获情况的分析表明，在法国南部，一般来说，油纸采样法可替代人饵叮咬捕获法。前一种方法更简便，且能同时在多个地点的广大区域开展工作。
