Suppr超能文献

[不同生理病理状态下的心房不应期及其离散度]

[Atrial refractoriness and its dispersion in different physiopathologic conditions].

作者信息

Michelucci A, Padeletti L, Molino Lova R, Fradella G A, Monizzi D, Franchi F

出版信息

G Ital Cardiol. 1982;12(8):555-62.

PMID:7169154
Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated a prolonged and non-uniform atrial refractoriness in patients with both sinus node dysfunction and supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. However, they have not been able to define separately the influence on atrial electrophysiologic properties of isolated "bradycardia", of sinus node dysfunction and of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. Therefore we have measured the effective and functional refractory periods at three different sites of the right atrium (high, middle and low lateral wall) in 16 normal subjects (N), in 9 patients with chronic asymptomatic sinus bradycardia (AB), in 9 patients with sinus node dysfunction but without evidence of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias (SSS) and in 10 patients with paroxismal atrial fibrillation (PAF). The study was performed both in sinus rhythm and during atrial pacing (120 beats/min) utilizing twice threshold stimuli. Dispersion of atrial refractoriness (D) was determined from the range of refractory periods measured at the three different atrial sites as the longest minus the shortest refractory period. Refractoriness at the high site of the lateral wall (parasinusal zone), mean values of the refractory periods obtained at the three atrial sites, and dispersion were compared among the three groups. Refractoriness at the two rates (sinus rhythm and 120 beats/min) was also compared. During sinus rhythm SSS, AB and PAF showed a significantly higher refractoriness than N, while only SSS and PAF showed increased D. Atrial pacing reduced refractoriness but not D in all groups. At the same driven frequency refractoriness of SSS and AB, and D of SSS and PAF were still significantly higher than those of N. Finally, it is noteworthy that during paced rhythm, single values of mean refractoriness of SSS did not correspond with those of N. In conclusion, our data suggest that: 1) sinus node dysfunction and supraventricular tachyarrhythmias exert an independent influence on atrial electrophysiologic properties; 2) the presence of a less homogeneous recovery of atrial excitability should be considered as a possible concause in the genesis of atrial fibrillation; 3) chronic isolated sinus bradycardia seems to be characterized by a longer atrial refractoriness and not by an increased D; 4) contrary to results obtained in animal subjects, there does not seem to be a relation between D and cycle length in man.

摘要

既往研究表明,患有窦房结功能障碍和室上性快速性心律失常的患者存在心房不应期延长且不均一的情况。然而,这些研究未能分别明确孤立的“心动过缓”、窦房结功能障碍以及室上性快速性心律失常对心房电生理特性的影响。因此,我们在16名正常受试者(N)、9名慢性无症状窦性心动过缓患者(AB)、9名有窦房结功能障碍但无室上性快速性心律失常证据的患者(SSS)以及10名阵发性心房颤动患者(PAF)中,测量了右心房三个不同部位(高位、中位和低位侧壁)的有效不应期和功能不应期。研究在窦性心律和心房起搏(120次/分钟)时进行,采用两倍阈值刺激。心房不应期离散度(D)根据在三个不同心房部位测量的不应期范围确定,即最长不应期减去最短不应期。比较了三组患者侧壁高位部位(窦旁区)的不应期、三个心房部位获得的不应期平均值以及离散度。还比较了两种心率(窦性心律和120次/分钟)下的不应期。在窦性心律时,SSS、AB和PAF的不应期显著高于N组,而只有SSS和PAF的D增加。心房起搏使所有组的不应期缩短,但D未改变。在相同的驱动频率下,SSS和AB的不应期以及SSS和PAF的D仍显著高于N组。最后,值得注意的是,在起搏心律时,SSS的平均不应期单个值与N组不对应。总之,我们的数据表明:1)窦房结功能障碍和室上性快速性心律失常对心房电生理特性有独立影响;2)心房兴奋性恢复的不均一性应被视为心房颤动发生的可能共同原因;3)慢性孤立性窦性心动过缓似乎以较长的心房不应期为特征,而非D增加;4)与在动物实验中获得的结果相反,在人类中D与心动周期长度之间似乎没有关系。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验