Michelucci A, Padeletti L, Fradella G A
Acta Cardiol. 1982;37(5):333-44.
Atrial refractoriness and vulnerability were studied in 10 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) and in 12 age-matched normal subjects (N). Effective and functional refractory periods were measured at three sites of the right atrium: high, middle and low in the lateral wall, both in sinus rhythm and during atrial pacing (120/min). Twice threshold stimuli were applied. Dispersion of refractoriness (D) was measured as the longest minus the shortest refractory period. Atrial fibrillation (AF) was induced in 5 of the PAF; in each of these 5 only one atrial site proved vulnerable (middle in one case, low in the other 4). In every case the shortest refractory period was located at the vulnerable atrial site. In vulnerable patients coupling intervals only slightly different from those which induced AF determined an abrupt change in the atrial electrogram recorded at the vulnerable site, suggesting a modified and in some way abnormal behaviour of the atrial activation wave. At the same time the interval between the beginning of the electrogram at the vulnerable site and of that obtained by the electrode positioned near the A-V node lengthened, suggesting a lower conduction velocity of the atrial activation wave. PAF evidenced significantly higher refractoriness and D than did N during sinus rhythm. Atrial pacing significantly reduced refractoriness but not D, which remained significantly higher than that of N at the same driven frequency. In conclusion, lower cycle length (paced rhythm), a short refractory period and the possibility of delivering extrastimulus at shorter coupling intervals seem conditions favourable to the induction of irregular activation of atrial myocardium. The increased D might be connected to the particular pathophysiological condition of our patients.
对10例阵发性心房颤动(PAF)患者和12例年龄匹配的正常受试者(N)进行了心房不应期和易损性研究。在窦性心律和心房起搏(120次/分钟)时,于右心房三个部位(侧壁的高、中、低位)测量有效不应期和功能不应期。施加两倍阈值刺激。不应期离散度(D)测量为最长不应期减去最短不应期。10例PAF患者中有5例诱发了心房颤动(AF);在这5例中的每一例中,仅一个心房部位被证明是易损的(1例为中位,其他4例为低位)。在每种情况下,最短不应期均位于易损心房部位。在易损患者中,与诱发AF的耦合间期仅稍有不同的耦合间期会导致在易损部位记录的心房电图突然改变,提示心房激活波的行为发生了改变且在某种程度上是异常的。与此同时,易损部位电图起始与位于房室结附近电极所获电图起始之间的间期延长,提示心房激活波的传导速度降低。PAF患者在窦性心律时的不应期和D值明显高于N组。心房起搏显著降低了不应期,但未降低D值,在相同驱动频率下D值仍显著高于N组。总之,较短的周期长度(起搏心律)、较短的不应期以及以较短耦合间期发放额外刺激的可能性似乎是诱发心房心肌不规则激活的有利条件。D值增加可能与我们患者的特殊病理生理状况有关。