Encke A, Starck E
Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1982;358:307-11. doi: 10.1007/BF01271804.
The efficacy of computed tomography in abdominal surgery must be compared with that of ultrasonography, which is more easily available, less expensive, and entails no radioactive risk. Both methods show high rates of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in the detection of parenchymatous lesions, tumors, local complications, tumor recurrences or metastases. Both can be combined with fine-needle biopsy. We think ultrasound scanning is more useful as a primary screening procedure and for follow-up studies, while CT gives a more detailed preoperative diagnosis, including tumor staging.
计算机断层扫描在腹部手术中的效能必须与超声检查的效能进行比较,超声检查更容易获得,成本更低,且不存在放射性风险。两种方法在检测实质性病变、肿瘤、局部并发症、肿瘤复发或转移方面均显示出较高的敏感性、特异性和准确性。两者都可以与细针活检相结合。我们认为超声扫描作为初步筛查程序和后续研究更有用,而CT能提供更详细的术前诊断,包括肿瘤分期。