Jablensky A
Acta Psychiatr Belg. 1978 Jul-Aug;78(4):549-58.
"Comparative psychiatry", which Kraepelin advocated 70 years ago, evolves today through the development of the epidemiological apporach in mental health. But its development is still hampered, by two methodological difficulties: 1. problems of definition of the "case"; 2. problems of evaluation, measure and classification of mental disorders. This has emphasized the need for an international common language for the description of mental health problems. The chapter V--Mental Disorders--of the International Classification of Diseases, in its 9th revision, illustrates the importance of such action. But the agreement on a diagnostic classification is only partially resolving the problem, because the concrete value of the classification is dependent on the reliability and validity of primary data on the patient. The World Health Organization is actively contributing to the standardization of assessment instruments; the Mental Health programme emphasizes the need for further efforts to elaborate a common language in mental health, both among psychiatrists from different countries, and between psychiatrists and planners of public health and other mental health personnel.
70年前克雷佩林所倡导的“比较精神病学”,如今随着心理健康领域流行病学方法的发展而不断演进。但其发展仍受到两个方法学难题的阻碍:1. “病例”定义问题;2. 精神障碍的评估、测量及分类问题。这凸显了为描述心理健康问题建立一种国际通用语言的必要性。《国际疾病分类》第9版第五章“精神障碍”就说明了此类行动的重要性。然而,仅就诊断分类达成一致只能部分解决问题,因为分类的具体价值取决于关于患者的原始数据的可靠性和有效性。世界卫生组织正在积极推动评估工具的标准化;心理健康项目强调,需要进一步努力,以便在来自不同国家的精神科医生之间,以及在精神科医生与公共卫生规划者及其他心理健康工作人员之间,构建一种心理健康方面的通用语言。