对三种本德尔格式塔计分系统作为精神病理学指标的评估。
An evaluation of three Bender-Gestalt scoring systems as indicators of psychopathology.
作者信息
Field K, Bolton B, Dana R H
出版信息
J Clin Psychol. 1982 Oct;38(4):838-42. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198210)38:4<838::aid-jclp2270380425>3.0.co;2-n.
Quantified Bender-Gestalt protocols of 120 clients using the Hutt, Pascal-Suttell, and Pauker scoring systems. Scores were correlated with two criteria of psychopathology, diagnosis of psychiatric disability and self-reported anxiety, and age and IQ. The results suggest that: (a) Ratings of B-G protocols are highly reliable; (b) B-G scores are not predictive of global psychopathology; and (c) B-G scores are correlated moderately with age and IQ. This evidence does not support the validity of B-G scoring systems as indicators of psychopathology.
使用赫特、帕斯卡 - 萨特韦尔和波克评分系统对120名客户的本德尔 - 格式塔测验进行量化分析。分数与两种精神病理学标准、精神残疾诊断和自我报告的焦虑以及年龄和智商相关。结果表明：（a）本德尔 - 格式塔测验协议的评分高度可靠；（b）本德尔 - 格式塔测验分数不能预测整体精神病理学；（c）本德尔 - 格式塔测验分数与年龄和智商呈中度相关。这一证据不支持将本德尔 - 格式塔测验评分系统作为精神病理学指标的有效性。
Zotero 插件