Duckro P N, Longstreet A, McLaughlin L J
J Clin Psychol. 1982 Oct;38(4):847-52. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198210)38:4<847::aid-jclp2270380427>3.0.co;2-j.
Offered data on a variety of five-subtest WAIS short forms from which the clinician may select. All short forms were derived and cross-validated with a low socioeconomic status sample (N = 80). Data were reported on correlation of predicted and actual scores and on absolute accuracy of prediction. No significant difference in prediction was found across race/gender subgroups or between weighted and prorated predictions. WAIS data were used despite the introduction of the WAIS-R because of the long lag time before sufficient WAIS-R protocols would be available and because the interrelationships of subtests on the WAIS and WAIS-R are highly similar.
提供了多种韦氏成人智力量表(WAIS)五个分测验简式的数据,临床医生可从中进行选择。所有简式均来自低社会经济地位样本(N = 80)并进行了交叉验证。报告了预测分数与实际分数的相关性以及预测的绝对准确性数据。在种族/性别亚组之间或加权预测与按比例预测之间,未发现预测存在显著差异。尽管引入了韦氏成人智力量表修订版(WAIS-R),但仍使用WAIS数据,原因是在获得足够的WAIS-R测验记录之前存在较长的延迟时间,且WAIS和WAIS-R上各分测验之间的相互关系高度相似。