Tsai S P, Lee E S, Hardy R J
Am J Public Health. 1978 Oct;68(10):966-71. doi: 10.2105/ajph.68.10.966.
The potential gains in total expectation of life and in the working life ages among the United States population are examined when the three leading causes of death are totally or partially eliminated. The impressive gains theoretically achieved by total elimination do not hold up under the more realistic assumption of partial elimination or reduction. The number of years gained by a new-born child, with a 30 per cent reduction in major cardiovascular diseases would be 1.98 years, for malignant neoplasms 0.71 years, and for motor vehicle accidents 0.21 years. Application of the same reduction to the working ages, 15 to 70 years, results in a gain of 0.43, 0.26, and 0.14 years, respectively for the three leading causes of death. Even with a scientific break-through in combating these causes of death, it appears that future gains in life expectancies for the working ages will not be spectacular. The implication of the results in relation to the current debate on the national health care policy is noted.
当美国人口中三大主要死因被全部或部分消除时,研究了预期寿命和工作年龄段的潜在增长情况。在部分消除或减少这一更为现实的假设下,理论上通过全部消除所取得的显著增长并不成立。对于一名新生儿而言,主要心血管疾病减少30%可使预期寿命增加1.98岁,恶性肿瘤减少30%可增加0.71岁,机动车事故减少30%可增加0.21岁。将相同比例的减少应用于15至70岁的工作年龄段人口,三大主要死因分别可使预期寿命增加0.43岁、0.26岁和0.14岁。即便在对抗这些死因方面取得科学突破,工作年龄段人口的预期寿命未来增长似乎也不会很显著。文中指出了这些结果与当前关于国家医疗保健政策辩论的关联。