Vojtecky M A
Med Care. 1982 Dec;20(12):1168-77. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198212000-00003.
A field study was conducted to examine the relative control of provider and consumer members of HSA Project Review Committee. Three project review committees chosen at random during a single HSA review cycle were observed throughout the decision-making process using Interaction Process Analysis. Results indicated that there were no significant differences in control between the provider and consumer members when considered as subgroups of the review committees. Findings also confirm the critical role of the chairperson in the organization and function of the group. It can be concluded that the occupational prestige of provider or consumer members is not imported into the planning situation to a sufficient degree to allow either the provider or consumer subgroup to dominate the planning process. Innovations in health care planning such as long-term education in health planning, group processes, and related issues should be attempted to enhance the effectiveness of these groups.
进行了一项实地研究，以检验健康储蓄账户（HSA）项目审查委员会中提供者成员和消费者成员的相对控制权。在单个HSA审查周期内随机选择了三个项目审查委员会，并在整个决策过程中使用互动过程分析进行观察。结果表明，当将提供者成员和消费者成员视为审查委员会的子群体时，他们在控制权方面没有显著差异。研究结果还证实了主席在小组组织和运作中的关键作用。可以得出结论，提供者成员或消费者成员的职业声望在规划情境中没有充分体现，以至于无法使提供者子群体或消费者子群体主导规划过程。应尝试在医疗保健规划方面进行创新，例如开展有关健康规划、群体过程及相关问题的长期教育，以提高这些群体的有效性。
