• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为社区中患有慢性精神疾病的残疾人制定一项可强制执行的“治疗权”理论。

Developing an enforceable "right to treatment" theory for the chronically mentally disabled in the community.

作者信息

Nordwind B L

出版信息

Schizophr Bull. 1982;8(4):642-51. doi: 10.1093/schbul/8.4.642.

DOI:10.1093/schbul/8.4.642
PMID:7178852
Abstract

Historical developments, mental health approaches, and applicable legal authorities are examined in arguing a legal basis for pursuing greater treatment benefits for chronically mentally disabled persons in the community. Mental health lawyers have traditionally been concerned with patients' right to treatment while in the hospital. Lawyers are called on to examine the plight of (and to extend advocacy for) the chronically mentally disabled in the community.

摘要

在为社区中慢性精神残疾者争取更多治疗福利寻求法律依据的过程中,我们审视了历史发展、心理健康治疗方法以及适用的法律权威。传统上,心理健康领域的律师关注的是患者在医院接受治疗的权利。现在,律师们被要求审视社区中慢性精神残疾者的困境(并为他们提供更多支持)。

相似文献

1
Developing an enforceable "right to treatment" theory for the chronically mentally disabled in the community.为社区中患有慢性精神疾病的残疾人制定一项可强制执行的“治疗权”理论。
Schizophr Bull. 1982;8(4):642-51. doi: 10.1093/schbul/8.4.642.
2
Law and the delivery of mental health services in the community.法律与社区心理健康服务的提供
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1994 Apr;64(2):194-208. doi: 10.1037/h0079526.
3
The Americans With Disabilities Act and community-based treatment law.《美国残疾人法案》与社区治疗法。
Psychiatr Serv. 1999 Apr;50(4):473-4, 480. doi: 10.1176/ps.50.4.473.
4
Law and the delivery of involuntary mental health services.法律与非自愿心理健康服务的提供
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1994 Apr;64(2):209-22. doi: 10.1037/h0079525.
5
Law & psychiatry: least restrictive alternative revisited: Olmstead's uncertain mandate for community-based care.法律与精神病学:重新审视限制最少的替代方案:奥姆斯特德对社区护理的不确定指令。
Psychiatr Serv. 1999 Oct;50(10):1271-2, 1280. doi: 10.1176/ps.50.10.1271.
6
Moving ahead with Olmstead: to comply with the American with Disabilities Act, states are working hard to find community placements for people with disabilities.推进奥姆斯特德法案:为遵守《美国残疾人法案》,各州正在努力为残疾人寻找社区安置场所。
State Legis. 2003 Mar;29(3):28-31.
7
Watching out for the mentally ill.关注精神疾病患者。
State Legis. 2000 Dec;26(10):32-4.
8
Balancing care and control: guardianship, community treatment orders and patient safeguards.
Int J Law Psychiatry. 1992;15(2):205-35. doi: 10.1016/0160-2527(92)90015-s.
9
The limits of liberty: deinstitutionalization, homelessness, and libertarian theory.
Emory Law J. 1982 Spring;31(2):375-440.
10
Perspectives on effective advocacy for homeless mentally ill persons.对为无家可归的精神病患者进行有效宣传的见解。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1992 Dec;43(12):1209-12. doi: 10.1176/ps.43.12.1209.