Jacobson J A, Hebertson R, Kasworm E
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982 Oct;22(4):643-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.22.4.643.
We compared the safety and efficacy of a six-dose regimen of cephalothin with a two-dose regimen of ceforanide for the prevention of infection after elective vaginal hysterectomy. A total of 150 patients were randomly assigned to either regimen. The overall incidence of documented pelvic infection was 5.3% and did not differ significantly between the prophylaxis groups when stratified by type of surgery. No serious adverse reactions were encountered in either group, but phlebitis was significantly more common in patients receiving cephalothin. We conclude that a two-dose regimen of ceforanide given intramuscularly is as effective as, and possibly better tolerated than, a six-dose regimen of cephalothin.
我们比较了头孢噻吩六剂方案与头孢雷特两剂方案预防择期阴道子宫切除术后感染的安全性和有效性。总共150例患者被随机分配至任一方案组。记录的盆腔感染总发生率为5.3%,按手术类型分层时,预防组之间无显著差异。两组均未出现严重不良反应,但接受头孢噻吩的患者静脉炎明显更常见。我们得出结论,肌肉注射头孢雷特两剂方案与头孢噻吩六剂方案效果相同,且耐受性可能更好。