Rombouts R
Act Nerv Super (Praha). 1982;Suppl 3(Pt 2):285-94.
Psychophysiological applications have been proposed for and have been found in diagnostic procedures, in therapeutic processes as well as in therapy evaluation studies. Many studies in this area have been done on cardiovascular parameters like heart rate, blood pressure and peripheral resistance. Unfortunately there is still little evidence whether physiological reactivity in these test situations are reproducible. We investigated the stability of heart rate (HR) and pulse transit time (PTT) reactions during simple and complex cognitive tasks, in two sessions with some days in between. The data showed that with simple cognitive tasks the subjects showed a strong habituation on both measures within one session. This habituation did not take place with complex stressors. We also found significant lower reactivity in the second session. Heart rate showed significant test retest reliabilities for males and females with simple stressors and for females only with complex stressors. PTT never showed significant test retest reliabilities. So heart rate proved to be the more reliable indication for cardiovascular reactivity. However, it still seems premature to use psychophysiological paradigms in standard diagnostics.
心理生理学应用已被提出用于诊断程序、治疗过程以及治疗评估研究中,并且也已在这些方面有所发现。该领域的许多研究都围绕心血管参数展开,如心率、血压和外周阻力。遗憾的是,目前仍缺乏证据表明这些测试情境中的生理反应是否具有可重复性。我们研究了在简单和复杂认知任务期间,心率(HR)和脉搏传输时间(PTT)反应在两个 sessions 之间间隔几天的情况下的稳定性。数据显示,在简单认知任务中,受试者在一个 session 内对这两种测量指标均表现出强烈的习惯化。而在复杂应激源情况下,这种习惯化并未发生。我们还发现,在第二个 session 中反应性显著降低。对于男性和女性而言,在简单应激源下心率显示出显著的重测信度,对于女性而言,仅在复杂应激源下心率显示出显著的重测信度。PTT 从未显示出显著的重测信度。因此,心率被证明是心血管反应性更可靠的指标。然而,在标准诊断中使用心理生理学范式似乎仍为时过早。