Wigren A, Amici F
Ital J Orthop Traumatol. 1982 Dec;8(4):405-12.
The authors report the results of clinical and radiological follow up examinations carried out between six months and four years after the insertion of Marmor knee prostheses in 135 patients (ninety-three with rheumatoid arthritis and forty-two with osteoarthrosis) operated on at the Orthopaedic Clinic of the University of Uppsala between 1975 and 1979. The results were very good and the few complications that arose were easily resolved. The authors have therefore adopted the Marmor prosthesis for routine use. The only valid alternative to this type of prosthesis is the spherocentric prosthesis, which was applied after failures with the Marmor or other types of prosthesis, in cases involving varus or valgus deformity exceeding 30 degrees, and in cases of severe bone destruction.
作者报告了1975年至1979年间在乌普萨拉大学骨科诊所接受手术的135例患者（93例类风湿性关节炎患者和42例骨关节炎患者）植入马莫尔膝关节假体后6个月至4年进行的临床和放射学随访检查结果。结果非常好，出现的少数并发症也很容易解决。因此，作者已采用马莫尔假体进行常规使用。这种类型假体的唯一有效替代方案是球心假体，它用于马莫尔或其他类型假体失败后、内翻或外翻畸形超过30度的病例以及严重骨破坏的病例。
