McDonald G J
J Homosex. 1982 Fall;8(1):47-60. doi: 10.1300/J082v08n01_05.
One hundred ninety-nine self-defined homosexual males were asked about the ages at which milestone events occurred in the coming out process (i.e., initial awareness of same-sex attractions, same-sex acts, self-designation as homosexual, initial involvement in a long-term relationship, self-disclosures to significant others, and acquiring a positive gay identity). Overall findings indicated that an orderly developmental sequence underlies the coming out process; however, not all subjects progressed in a predictable fashion from an awareness of same-sex feelings through behavior to eventual self-labelling, self-disclosure, and final stabilization of a positive gay identity. A number of individual differences emerged: 18% of the sample labelled themselves "homosexual" in the absence of any overt same-sex sexual experience; 22% arrived at homosexual self-definitions while participating in a long-term relationship with another man; 23% adopted homosexual self-definitions only after involvement in such a relationship. Fifteen percent of the respondents indicated that they had not acquired a positive gay identity (i.e., were not glad to be gay). These individuals differed from the remainder of the sample on a number of significant measures reflective of psychological health. Significant differences were also found among three cohort groups with respect to age at occurrence of particular milestone events. Findings from the present investigation were explored in relation to both the theoretical conceptions and available empirical data concerned with homosexual identity formation.
199名自认为是同性恋的男性被问及在出柜过程中里程碑事件发生的年龄(即首次意识到同性吸引、发生同性性行为、自我认定为同性恋、首次开始长期恋爱关系、向重要他人出柜以及获得积极的同性恋身份)。总体研究结果表明,出柜过程有一个有序的发展序列;然而,并非所有受试者都以可预测的方式从意识到同性情感,经过行为,最终发展到自我认同、自我披露以及最终稳定形成积极的同性恋身份。出现了一些个体差异:18%的样本在没有任何明显同性性经历的情况下就将自己标记为“同性恋”;22%在与另一名男性建立长期恋爱关系时确定了同性恋的自我定义;23%仅在参与这样的恋爱关系后才采用同性恋的自我定义。15%的受访者表示他们没有获得积极的同性恋身份(即对自己是同性恋并不感到高兴)。这些个体在一些反映心理健康的重要指标上与样本中的其他个体不同。在特定里程碑事件发生的年龄方面,三个队列组之间也发现了显著差异。本调查结果结合与同性恋身份形成相关的理论概念和现有实证数据进行了探讨。