Suppr超能文献

Comparative bioavailability of chlorpropamide tablet and suspension formulations.

作者信息

Batenhorst R L, Bustrack J A, Bivins B A, Foster T S

出版信息

Clin Pharm. 1982 Jan-Feb;1(1):58-61.

PMID:7184670
Abstract

The bioavailability of a chlorpropamide tablet formulation chlorpropamide tablet formulation was assessed by comparing it to a reference suspension of chlorpropamide. Eighteen healthy adult men received chlorpropamide 250 mg as a tablet (Diabinese, Pfizer) and suspension in an open two-way crossover study of Latin-square design with a 14-day washout period between treatments. Serial blood samples were obtained by venipuncture for 96 hours for chlorpropamide serum concentration determinations. Serum glucose concentrations were determined at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 hours. The area under the serum chlorpropamide concentration-time curve (AUC), peak serum chlorpropamide concentration (Cmax), time to Cmax, and mean glucose concentration at each time point for each treatment were compared using a two-tailed Student's t test for paired data (p less than 0.05). Microrate constants for a two-compartment model for oral absorption computed using nonlinear regression were also compared. There were no significant differences between the two formulations regarding AUC, Cmax, time to Cmax, and hypoglycemic response. The absorption rate for the tablet was significantly greater than for the suspension. The results suggest that the oral chlorpropamide tablet and reference suspension are bioequivalent. Although the tablet had a faster absorption rate than the suspension, this probably is not clinically important since both formulations similarly decreased serum glucose concentration.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验