Parker R M, Kasten R N, McCroskey R L, Hoyer E A
J Aud Res. 1981 Oct;21(3):195-200.
Auditory temporal ordering was investigated in 5 normal-hearing young adults. Ss made diotic 2IFC judgments for pure tones of 0.5, 1, 2, or 4 kc/s and critical-band noises centered at those frequencies, on duration (standard: 40 msec; variables: 10, 20, or 30 msec), level (standard: 70 db HL; variables: 40, 50 or 60 HL), and frequency (standard: 0.5 kc/s; variables: 1,2, or 4 kc/s). Interstimulus interval (ISI) was 5, 10, 20, 50, 100, or 200 msec. All stimuli were at 70 db HL except of course the variable stimuli in the level judgments. Performance improved with increasing ISI. Mean threshold ISIs (performance at 75%-correct) collapsed across pure tones and noise bands were 12.5, 6.25, and 6.25 msec for duration, level, and frequency, respectively. With ISI constant at 100 msec, ANOVAs revealed statistically significant differences among the variables for duration and for level but not for frequency (performance for frequency was nearly perfect at the shortest ISI). There were statistically significant differences between mean performance, and between mean threshold ISIs, for duration, level, and frequency, indicating that auditory temporal acuity is not independent of the kinds of sound, as has been suggested (Hirsh, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 1959, 31, p. 759).
对5名听力正常的年轻成年人的听觉时间排序进行了研究。受试者对0.5、1、2或4千周/秒的纯音以及以这些频率为中心的临界带宽噪声进行双耳两分法迫选判断,判断内容涉及持续时间(标准值:40毫秒;变量值:10、20或30毫秒)、强度(标准值:70分贝听力级;变量值:40、50或60分贝听力级)和频率(标准值:0.5千周/秒;变量值:1、2或4千周/秒)。刺激间隔(ISI)为5、10、20、50、100或200毫秒。除了强度判断中的变量刺激外,所有刺激的强度均为70分贝听力级。随着刺激间隔增加,表现有所改善。对于持续时间、强度和频率,将纯音和噪声频段的数据合并后,平均阈值刺激间隔(正确率为75%时的表现)分别为12.5、6.25和6.25毫秒。当刺激间隔恒定为100毫秒时,方差分析显示,持续时间和强度变量之间存在统计学显著差异,但频率变量之间没有(在最短刺激间隔时,频率判断的表现几乎完美)。持续时间、强度和频率的平均表现之间以及平均阈值刺激间隔之间存在统计学显著差异,这表明听觉时间敏锐度并非如之前所认为的那样(赫什,《美国声学学会杂志》,1959年,第31卷,第759页)与声音类型无关。