Gilmore P C, Carlow T J
Neurology. 1980 Nov;30(11):1229-30. doi: 10.1212/wnl.30.11.1229.
The pupillary near response should always be evaluated when the light response is defective. We present a case of diabetic third-nerve paresis with concomitant light-near dissociation. Without careful evaluation of the near response, angiography would have been indicated to rule out a posterior communicating artery aneurysm. Pharmacologic and slit lamp testing can be used to verify light-near dissociation.
当光反应出现缺陷时,应始终评估瞳孔近反射。我们报告一例伴有光近分离的糖尿病性动眼神经麻痹病例。若未仔细评估近反射,可能会进行血管造影以排除后交通动脉瘤。药理学和裂隙灯检查可用于验证光近分离。