Anderson L G, Bina P R
Arzneimittelforschung. 1980;30(4A):735-9.
25 out-patients with active classical or definite adult-onset rheumatoid arthritis were enrolled in a 4-week randomized, two-period double-blind cross-over study comparing gamma-oxo(1,1'-biphenyl)-4-butanoic acid (fenbufen) (1000 mg/d) and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) (3600 mg/d). Only patients with active, flaring disease, off antiinflammatory drugs, were admitted into this study. Significant mean improvement from baseline was seen with both fenbufen and ASA after two weeks of treatment. There were no statistically significant differences between the degree of improvement from baseline between fenbufen and ASA. However, there were significant differences in patient tolerance of the two medications with more patients reporting adverse experiences with ASA than with fenbufen. The differences between treatments were statistically significant for side effects graded as moderate or severe with 6 patients experiencing drug-related side effects on ASA compared to none on fenbufen.
25名患有活动性典型或确诊的成人型类风湿性关节炎的门诊患者参与了一项为期4周的随机、两阶段双盲交叉研究,该研究比较了γ-氧代(1,1'-联苯)-4-丁酸(芬布芬)(1000毫克/天)和乙酰水杨酸(ASA)(3600毫克/天)。只有患有活动性、病情发作的疾病且未服用抗炎药物的患者被纳入本研究。治疗两周后,芬布芬和ASA均观察到相对于基线有显著的平均改善。芬布芬和ASA相对于基线的改善程度之间没有统计学上的显著差异。然而,两种药物在患者耐受性方面存在显著差异,报告服用ASA出现不良经历的患者比服用芬布芬的患者更多。对于评为中度或重度的副作用,治疗之间的差异具有统计学意义,有6名患者在服用ASA时出现与药物相关的副作用,而服用芬布芬的患者则无此情况。