Salzman R T, Reid R T
Eur J Rheumatol Inflamm. 1982;5(3):318-25.
A controlled trial was designed to compare both the long-term efficacy and the safety of fenbufen and indomethacin in patients with osteoarthritis. One hundred and ten patients of both sexes (aged 33 to 79 years) who had both subjective and objective (including radiological) evidence of osteoarthritis, and who met the minimal entry criteria, were enrolled into the studies. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either fenbufen capsules b.i.d. (600-1000 mg/day) or identical appearing indomethacin capsules b.i.d. (750-125 mg/day). Thirty-seven fenbufen and 26 indomethacin patients completed twelve months of treatment. Both fenbufen and indomethacin provided statistically nd clinically significant improvement at months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12. There were no significant differences in improvement between the two treatment groups. Fenbufen-treated patients, however, reported fewer occurrences (4) of severe drug-related adverse experiences than indomethacin-treated patients (20). Significantly fewer headaches were reported with fenbufen and the number of patients terminating treatment because of adverse experiences was significantly greater with indomethacin. Fenbufen, in this patient population, provided a superior ratio of benefits to risk for the long-term treatment of osteoarthritis.U
设计了一项对照试验,以比较芬布芬和吲哚美辛对骨关节炎患者的长期疗效和安全性。110名符合最低入选标准、有骨关节炎主观和客观(包括放射学)证据的患者(年龄33至79岁,男女均有)被纳入研究。患者被随机分配接受每日两次的芬布芬胶囊(600 - 1000毫克/天)或外观相同的每日两次的吲哚美辛胶囊(75 - 125毫克/天)。37名服用芬布芬和26名服用吲哚美辛的患者完成了12个月的治疗。在第1、3、6、9和12个月时,芬布芬和吲哚美辛在统计学和临床上均有显著改善。两个治疗组之间的改善情况没有显著差异。然而,服用芬布芬的患者报告的严重药物相关不良事件发生率(4例)低于服用吲哚美辛的患者(20例)。服用芬布芬报告的头痛明显较少,因不良事件终止治疗的患者人数在吲哚美辛组明显更多。在该患者群体中,芬布芬在骨关节炎的长期治疗中提供了更好的效益风险比。