Pohorecky L A
Fed Proc. 1981 May 15;40(7):2056-64.
A review of rodent analogs of alcohol tolerance and dependence is presented. Depending on the control exerted by the experimental subject, analogs presently available are of three general types: involuntary, semivoluntary, and voluntary. With the involuntary analogs, the experimenter has total control of the administration of ethanol; that is, the selected dose is administered at a preselected schedule and rate. The following methods are in this category; inhalation, oral intubation, intragastric or intravenous schedule infusions, and SERT (sustained ethanol release tubes) implants. With the semivoluntary analogs the animals ingest ethanol via either the daily liquid or food supply, at their own pace. With the voluntary analogs, animals self-select ethanol orally, or self-infuse it intravenously or intragastrically. The characteristics, advantages, and disadvantages of each method are discussed. No method is ideal, and none satisfies all the criteria of an animal analog of "alcoholism." Therefore, the method of choice should be that which is most adequate for the particular aims of a given experiment.
本文对酒精耐受性和依赖性的啮齿动物模型进行了综述。根据实验对象所受的控制,目前可用的模型一般有三种类型:非自愿型、半自愿型和自愿型。对于非自愿型模型,实验者完全控制乙醇的给药;也就是说,按照预先选定的时间表和速率给予选定的剂量。以下方法属于这一类别:吸入、口服插管、胃内或静脉定时输注以及植入持续乙醇释放管(SERT)。对于半自愿型模型,动物通过每日的液体或食物供应自行摄取乙醇,摄取速度由它们自己决定。对于自愿型模型,动物自行口服选择乙醇,或自行静脉内或胃内注入乙醇。文中讨论了每种方法的特点、优点和缺点。没有一种方法是理想的,也没有一种方法能满足“酒精中毒”动物模型的所有标准。因此,选择的方法应该是最适合特定实验特定目的的方法。