Weiler-Ravell D, Godfrey S
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1981 May;67(5):391-7. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(81)90085-3.
Twelve asthmatics (ages 8 to 33 yr) with proven exercise-induced asthma (EIA) and allergen-induced asthma (AIA) were investigated in an attempt to elucidate the pathways through which each type of attack develops. All patients were rendered refractory to EIA by repeated exercise at short intervals and were then immediately challenged by inhalation with an allergen known to evoke AIA. After an average of three runs all subjects were rendered refractory to EIA (post-exercise fall in FEV1 of 7 +/- 8% SEM compared with the control postexercise fall of 32 +/- 14%). In this refractory state six patients failed to respond to antigen challenge (6 +/- 4% SEM fall in FEV1 compared with the 30 +/- 3% fall in control study, p less than 0.001), suggesting a common pathway for EIA and AIA, such as the exhaustion of stored chemical mediators. Six other patients developed attacks of AIA while refractory to EIA, which were at least as severe as those in their control study (34 +/- 7% SEM fall in FEV1 compared with 29 +/- 3%). The fact that AIA could develop while EIA was blocked in this group requires an alternate pathway or mechanism for their AIA. The only significant difference between the AIA "blocked" and AIA "nonblocked" groups was a lower baseline level of lung function in all tests in the nonblocked group.
对12名患有运动诱发性哮喘(EIA)和变应原诱发性哮喘(AIA)的哮喘患者(年龄8至33岁)进行了研究,以试图阐明每种类型发作的发展途径。所有患者通过短时间间隔的重复运动而对EIA产生耐受,然后立即用已知可诱发AIA的变应原进行吸入激发试验。平均经过三次运动后,所有受试者均对EIA产生耐受(运动后FEV1下降7±8% SEM,而对照运动后下降为32±14%)。在这种耐受状态下,6名患者对抗原激发试验无反应(FEV1下降6±4% SEM,而对照研究中下降为30±3%,p<0.001),提示EIA和AIA存在共同途径,如储存化学介质的耗竭。另外6名患者在对EIA耐受时发生了AIA发作,其严重程度至少与对照研究中的发作相同(FEV1下降34±7% SEM,而对照为29±3%)。该组中在EIA被阻断时AIA仍可发作这一事实提示其AIA存在另一种途径或机制。“阻断”AIA组与“未阻断”AIA组之间唯一显著的差异是未阻断组在所有试验中的肺功能基线水平较低。