• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

性能评估:连续腰段硬膜外麻醉技能测试。

Performance evaluation: continuous lumbar epidural anesthesia skill test.

作者信息

Sivarajan M, Lane P E, Miller E V, Liu P, Herr G, Willenkin R, Winter P, Hardy C A, Mulroy M F

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 1981 Aug;60(8):543-7.

PMID:7196166
Abstract

The evaluation of skills in anesthesiology residents is usually subjective and lacks demonstrable reliability. Therefore, an objective criterion-referenced skill test for measuring performance of continuous lumbar epidural anesthesia was developed. For such a test to be useful, it is necessary to demonstrate agreement among rater-observers. Eight performances of continuous lumbar epidural anesthesia were recorded on video tape and simultaneously rated by nine anesthesiology faculty observers to determine inter-rater reliability. Inter-rater agreement was analyzed by determining coefficient kappa for each item and the entire test. Coefficient kappa for the entire test was 0.82 indicating a high degree of agreement between raters on the performance or nonperformance of various items. Development and utility of skill tests are discussed.

摘要

对麻醉住院医师技能的评估通常是主观的,且缺乏可证明的可靠性。因此,开发了一种用于测量连续腰段硬膜外麻醉操作表现的客观标准参照技能测试。要使这样的测试有用,有必要证明评分观察者之间的一致性。连续腰段硬膜外麻醉的八次操作被录制在录像带上,并由九位麻醉学教员观察者同时进行评分,以确定评分者间的可靠性。通过确定每个项目和整个测试的kappa系数来分析评分者间的一致性。整个测试的kappa系数为0.82,表明评分者在各项操作表现与否上高度一致。讨论了技能测试的开发和实用性。

相似文献

1
Performance evaluation: continuous lumbar epidural anesthesia skill test.性能评估:连续腰段硬膜外麻醉技能测试。
Anesth Analg. 1981 Aug;60(8):543-7.
2
Testing the raters: inter-rater reliability of standardized anaesthesia simulator performance.测试评估者:标准化麻醉模拟器操作的评估者间信度
Can J Anaesth. 1997 Sep;44(9):924-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03011962.
3
Objective evaluation of clinical performance and correlation with knowledge.
Anesth Analg. 1984 Jun;63(6):603-7.
4
Assessment of neonatal resuscitation skills: a reliable and valid scoring system.新生儿复苏技能评估:一种可靠且有效的评分系统。
Resuscitation. 2006 Nov;71(2):212-21. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.04.009. Epub 2006 Sep 20.
5
Experience is not enough: repeated breaches in epidural anesthesia aseptic technique by novice operators despite improved skill.经验并不足够:尽管新手操作者的技能有所提高,但硬膜外麻醉无菌技术仍反复出现违规情况。
Anesthesiology. 2008 May;108(5):914-20. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31816bbdb6.
6
Feasibility, reliability and validity of an operative performance rating system for evaluating surgery residents.一种用于评估外科住院医师的手术操作评分系统的可行性、可靠性和有效性。
Surgery. 2005 Oct;138(4):640-7; discussion 647-9. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.07.017.
7
Development of workplace-based assessments of non-technical skills in anaesthesia.麻醉中非技术技能的基于工作场所评估的发展。
Anaesthesia. 2012 Feb;67(2):158-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06977.x.
8
Incorporating simulation-based objective structured clinical examination into the Israeli National Board Examination in Anesthesiology.将基于模拟的客观结构化临床考试纳入以色列麻醉学国家委员会考试。
Anesth Analg. 2006 Mar;102(3):853-8. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000194934.34552.ab.
9
Construct validity of an objective assessment method for laparoscopic intracorporeal suturing and knot tying.腹腔镜体内缝合与打结客观评估方法的结构效度。
Am J Surg. 2008 Jul;196(1):74-80. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.08.058. Epub 2008 Apr 16.
10
Increasing inter-rater agreement on a family medicine clerkship oral examination--a pilot study.提高家庭医学实习口试中评分者间的一致性——一项试点研究。
Fam Med. 1993 Mar;25(3):182-5.