• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过专业标准审查组织(PSRO)合作研究评估医疗实践,对九个PSRO地区的剖宫产情况进行评估。

Assessing medical practices through PSRO cooperative studies, an evaluation of Cesarean births in nine PSRO areas.

作者信息

Jessee W F, Nickerson C W, Grant W S

出版信息

Med Care. 1982 Jan;20(1):75-84. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198201000-00006.

DOI:10.1097/00005650-198201000-00006
PMID:7200561
Abstract

Nine Professional Standards Review Organizations jointly conducted an areawide medical care evaluation study of Cesarean births. Of 5,002 Cesarean births studied in 158 hospitals, only 1.1 per cent were judged to be unjustified procedures by local physician peer review. Although there was substantial geographic variation in rates of Cesarean birth (11.0%-18.3 per cent), no statistically significant pattern of variation was identified. Maternal outcomes and infant outcomes were generally good. This study demonstrates the potential for use of PSRO data in studying major issues in health care, as well as the practical constraints of such studies.

摘要

九个专业标准审查组织联合开展了一项关于剖宫产的区域医疗评估研究。在158家医院研究的5002例剖宫产中,当地医生同行评审判定只有1.1%为不合理手术。尽管剖宫产率存在显著的地域差异(11.0%-18.3%),但未发现具有统计学意义的变化模式。产妇和婴儿的结局总体良好。这项研究表明了利用专业标准审查组织(PSRO)数据研究医疗保健重大问题的潜力,以及此类研究的实际限制。

相似文献

1
Assessing medical practices through PSRO cooperative studies, an evaluation of Cesarean births in nine PSRO areas.通过专业标准审查组织(PSRO)合作研究评估医疗实践,对九个PSRO地区的剖宫产情况进行评估。
Med Care. 1982 Jan;20(1):75-84. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198201000-00006.
2
First nationwide multi-PSRO MCE unveiled: C-sections topic of study.
Hosp Peer Rev. 1979 Apr;4(4):47-8.
3
The PSRO hospital review system.
Med Care. 1975 Apr;13(4 Suppl):1-33.
4
Peer review now: PSRO at work.
Mod Healthc (Short Term Care). 1975 Jan;3(1):49-55.
5
Orphan data and the unclosed loop: a dilemma in PSRO and medical audit.孤儿数据与未闭合循环:专业标准审查组织(PSRO)及医学审计中的困境
N Engl J Med. 1976 Sep 9;295(11):617-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197609092951111.
6
Recent patterns in cesarean delivery in the United States.美国剖宫产的近期模式。
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1988 Dec;15(4):607-27.
7
PSRO: current status of the professional standards review organization program.专业标准审查组织计划的当前状况
Am J Occup Ther. 1976 Jul;30(6):370-5.
8
The challenge: PSRO and optometry.挑战:专业标准审查组织与验光专业
J Am Optom Assoc. 1976 Feb;47(2):158-62.
9
Evaluating the impact of physician peer review: factors associated with successful PSROs.评估医师同行评审的影响:与成功的专业标准审查组织相关的因素。
Am J Public Health. 1983 Oct;73(10):1182-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.73.10.1182.
10
Hospital variation in cesarean delivery rates: contribution of individual and hospital factors in Florida.佛罗里达州剖宫产率的医院差异:个体因素和医院因素的作用
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jan;214(1):123.e1-123.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.027. Epub 2015 Aug 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Caesarean section in uninsured women in the USA: systematic review and meta-analysis.美国未参保女性的剖宫产:系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 3;9(3):e025356. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025356.
2
Hospitalization style of physicians in Manitoba: the disturbing lack of logic in medical practice.曼尼托巴省医生的住院治疗方式:医疗实践中令人不安的逻辑缺失。
Health Serv Res. 1992 Aug;27(3):361-84.