• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用已建立的猪肾细胞株进行猪霍乱病毒滴定和中和试验的微量方法。

Micro method for performing titration and neutralization test of hog cholera virus using established porcine kidney cell strain.

作者信息

Komaniwa H, Fukusho A, Shimizu Y

出版信息

Natl Inst Anim Health Q (Tokyo). 1981 Winter;21(4):153-8.

PMID:7200574
Abstract

Hog cholera (HC) virus and antibody against it were estimated by the END method with microplates and CPK porcine kidney cell strain. To establish the technique of this method, studies were made on such basic conditions of the method as the type of strain of Newcastle disease virus (NDV), the time of challenge with this virus, and the concentration of serum in culture fluid. There was little difference in the infective titer of HC virus estimated between the END method performed by the established technique and the same method by the conventional technique with test tubes and swine testicle (ST) cells. Besides, there was a high correlation between the neutralizing antibody titer measured by the one technique and that measured by the other. The coefficient of correlation was r = +0.948 in this case. From the experimental results mentioned above it was concluded that the END method by the micro-technique with CPK cells was simpler than and as reliable as the same method conducted by any conventional technique, and that it was a practicable one capable of testing many samples.

摘要

采用微量板和CPK猪肾细胞株的蚀斑减少中和试验(END)法对猪霍乱(HC)病毒及其抗体进行了检测。为建立该方法的技术,对新城疫病毒(NDV)毒株类型、该病毒攻毒时间以及培养液中血清浓度等该方法的基本条件进行了研究。采用既定技术进行的END法与采用传统试管和猪睾丸(ST)细胞技术进行的END法所测得的HC病毒感染滴度差异不大。此外,两种技术所测得的中和抗体滴度之间具有高度相关性。在这种情况下,相关系数r = +0.948。根据上述实验结果得出结论,采用CPK细胞的微量技术进行的END法比任何传统技术进行的相同方法更简单且同样可靠,并且它是一种能够检测许多样本的实用方法。

相似文献

1
Micro method for performing titration and neutralization test of hog cholera virus using established porcine kidney cell strain.使用已建立的猪肾细胞株进行猪霍乱病毒滴定和中和试验的微量方法。
Natl Inst Anim Health Q (Tokyo). 1981 Winter;21(4):153-8.
2
A mutant of hog cholera virus inducing interference in swine testicle cell cultures.一种在猪睾丸细胞培养物中引发干扰的猪霍乱病毒突变体。
Am J Vet Res. 1970 Oct;31(10):1787-94.
3
Enhancement of rubella virus replication in swine testicle cells by co-infection with hog cholera virus.猪瘟病毒共感染增强风疹病毒在猪睾丸细胞中的复制
Jpn J Microbiol. 1971 Sep;15(5):397-406.
4
A study on the susceptibility of minipig kidney (MPK) and rabbit kidney (RK13) cell line cultures to the lapinized Chinese strain of hog cholera virus.
Microbiologica. 1988 Oct;11(4):371-8.
5
[Detection of antibodies against hog cholera virus, Chinese strain. I. Laboratory tests].[猪霍乱病毒中国株抗体的检测。I. 实验室检测]
Arch Vet Ital. 1970 Dec 31;21(6):399-411.
6
Evaluation of the fluorescent antibody--cell culture test for detection and titration of hog cholera virus.荧光抗体-细胞培养试验用于检测和滴定猪霍乱病毒的评估。
Natl Inst Anim Health Q (Tokyo). 1969 Spring;9(1):10-9.
7
Increased sensitivity of the END (exaltation of Newcastle disease virus) test for hog cholera virus.猪霍乱病毒新城疫病毒增强试验(END试验)的敏感性提高。
Am J Vet Res. 1965 Sep;26(114):1110-3.
8
A rapid virus neutralization assay for Newcastle disease virus with the swine testicular continuous cell line.
Avian Dis. 1999 Jul-Sep;43(3):564-71.
9
Reverse interference method for measurement of hog cholera virus (HCV) and anti-HCV antibody.
J Vet Med Sci. 1993 Apr;55(2):233-6. doi: 10.1292/jvms.55.233.
10
Detection of a cell line contaminated with hog cholera virus.
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1994 Sep 1;205(5):742-5.

引用本文的文献

1
The narrow window of protection: protective efficacy of maternally derived antibodies against virulent classical swine fever virus in Japan.保护的狭窄窗口期:日本母源抗体对强毒经典猪瘟病毒的保护效力
Vet Res. 2025 Jul 16;56(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s13567-025-01583-z.
2
Oral infectivity and 50% porcine infectious dose of classical swine fever virus JPN/1/2018 strain isolated from the first case in Japan.从日本首例病例中分离出的经典猪瘟病毒JPN/1/2018株的口腔传染性和50%猪感染剂量
J Vet Med Sci. 2025 Jul 1;87(7):769-773. doi: 10.1292/jvms.25-0123. Epub 2025 Apr 30.
3
Sex-based differences in the distribution of Aujeszky's disease-seropositive Japanese wild boar.
伪狂犬病血清阳性日本野猪分布的性别差异。
Porcine Health Manag. 2023 Jun 13;9(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s40813-023-00323-z.
4
First Isolation and Identification of Homologous Recombination Events of Porcine Adenovirus from Wild Boar.首次从野猪中分离鉴定出猪腺病毒同源重组事件。
Viruses. 2022 Oct 29;14(11):2400. doi: 10.3390/v14112400.
5
Establishment of a Direct PCR Assay for Simultaneous Differential Diagnosis of African Swine Fever and Classical Swine Fever Using Crude Tissue Samples.建立一种直接 PCR 检测方法,用于同时检测粗组织样品中的非洲猪瘟和古典猪瘟。
Viruses. 2022 Feb 28;14(3):498. doi: 10.3390/v14030498.
6
Characteristics of Classical Swine Fever Virus Variants Derived from Live Attenuated GPE Vaccine Seed.源自活疫苗种毒的经典猪瘟病毒变异株的特征。
Viruses. 2021 Aug 23;13(8):1672. doi: 10.3390/v13081672.
7
Establishment of an Alzheimer's disease model with latent herpesvirus infection using PS2 and Tg2576 double transgenic mice.利用PS2和Tg2576双转基因小鼠建立潜伏性疱疹病毒感染的阿尔茨海默病模型。
Exp Anim. 2018 May 10;67(2):185-192. doi: 10.1538/expanim.17-0066. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
8
IRES-mediated translation of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) in cultured cells derived from FMDV-susceptible and -insusceptible animals.内部核糖体进入位点(IRES)介导的口蹄疫病毒(FMDV)在源自对口蹄疫病毒易感和不易感动物的培养细胞中的翻译。
BMC Vet Res. 2016 Mar 31;12:66. doi: 10.1186/s12917-016-0694-8.
9
Expression and purification of Suid Herpesvirus-1 glycoprotein E in the baculovirus system and its use to diagnose Aujeszky's disease in infected pigs.猪疱疹病毒1型糖蛋白E在杆状病毒系统中的表达、纯化及其在诊断感染猪伪狂犬病中的应用。
Protein Expr Purif. 2013 Jul;90(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2013.04.008. Epub 2013 Apr 28.
10
Selection of classical swine fever virus with enhanced pathogenicity reveals synergistic virulence determinants in E2 and NS4B.选择具有增强致病性的经典猪瘟病毒揭示了 E2 和 NS4B 中的协同毒力决定因素。
J Virol. 2012 Aug;86(16):8602-13. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00551-12. Epub 2012 Jun 6.