• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双侧输卵管伞端阻塞治疗方法的比较。

A comparison of treatment for bilateral fimbrial occlusion.

作者信息

DeCherney A H, Kase N

出版信息

Fertil Steril. 1981 Feb;35(2):162-6. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)45316-1.

DOI:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)45316-1
PMID:7202741
Abstract

Eighteen patients with bilateral tubal occlusion were divided in an alternating fashion just prior to surgery into two groups for definitive treatment. One group consisted of nine women who underwent a two-stage procedure utilizing a Rock-Mulligan prosthesis; the other nine women underwent terminal salpingostomy utilizing microsurgical technique. Microsurgical technique was defined as the use of microcautery, lavage, and careful handling of tissues; the operating microscope was employed to achieve better visualization and hence better hemostasis and minimized tissue trauma. Both groups received pre-, intra-, and postoperative antibiotics, Decadron, and Phenergan. Hysterosalpingography revealed a patency rate of 89% in the hood group and in the group in which microsurgical technique was used. The term intrauterine pregnancy rates were 22.2% in the hood group (two of nine) and 44.4% in the group in which microsurgical technique was used (four of nine). In this small series there were no ectopic pregnancies or early pregnancy wastage. Subsequently, a series of 54 patients was treated by terminal salpingostomy with an over-all term intrauterine pregnancy rate of 26%. From this study, we conclude that the use of Rock-Mulligan hoods offers no distinct advantage over microsurgical salpingostomy, but has the disadvantage of requiring two surgical procedures.

摘要

18例双侧输卵管阻塞患者在手术前被交替分为两组进行确定性治疗。一组由9名女性组成,她们接受了使用Rock-Mulligan假体的两阶段手术;另外9名女性采用显微外科技术进行了输卵管末端造口术。显微外科技术的定义为使用微型电烙器、灌洗以及小心处理组织;使用手术显微镜以实现更好的视野,从而实现更好的止血并将组织创伤降至最低。两组患者均在术前、术中和术后接受了抗生素、地塞米松和非那根治疗。子宫输卵管造影显示,使用Rock-Mulligan假体组和使用显微外科技术组的通畅率均为89%。使用Rock-Mulligan假体组的宫内妊娠率为22.2%(9例中的2例),使用显微外科技术组的宫内妊娠率为44.4%(9例中的4例)。在这个小样本系列中,没有宫外孕或早期妊娠丢失的情况。随后,54例患者接受了输卵管末端造口术治疗,总体宫内妊娠率为26%。从这项研究中,我们得出结论,使用Rock-Mulligan假体相对于显微外科输卵管造口术没有明显优势,但有需要进行两次外科手术的缺点。

相似文献

1
A comparison of treatment for bilateral fimbrial occlusion.双侧输卵管伞端阻塞治疗方法的比较。
Fertil Steril. 1981 Feb;35(2):162-6. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)45316-1.
2
Surgical management of distal tubal occlusion.输卵管远端阻塞的手术治疗
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Sep;155(3):524-31. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(86)90272-3.
3
[Microsurgery of distal tubal lesions. Analysis of 270 operated cases].[输卵管远端病变的显微外科手术。270例手术病例分析]
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1986;15(3):339-46.
4
Surgery of the fallopian tube.输卵管手术
Int J Fertil. 1984;29(2):65-72.
5
Proximal tubal occlusion: microsurgery versus IVF--a review.近端输卵管阻塞:显微手术与体外受精——综述
Int J Fertil. 1988 Sep-Oct;33(5):338-40.
6
Techniques for pelvic surgery in subfertility.治疗不孕症的盆腔手术技术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD000221. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000221.
7
Microsurgical salpingostomy is not an obsolete procedure.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991 Jul;98(7):637-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1991.tb13448.x.
8
Nonsurgical fallopian tube recanalization for treatment of infertility.非手术输卵管再通术治疗不孕症。
Radiology. 1990 Feb;174(2):371-4. doi: 10.1148/radiology.174.2.2296648.
9
The intussusception salpingostomy technique for the therapy of distal oviductal occlusion at laparoscopy.腹腔镜下肠套叠输卵管造口术治疗远端输卵管阻塞技术
Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Sep;78(3 Pt 1):443-7.
10
Use of corticosteroids as an adjuvant in terminal salpingostomy.皮质类固醇在输卵管末端造口术中作为辅助剂的应用。
Fertil Steril. 1983 Dec;40(6):785-9. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)47480-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Is There Still a Place for Reconstructive Surgery in Distal Tubal Disease?输卵管远端疾病的重建手术还有存在的空间吗?
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 8;11(12):3278. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123278.