Goldstein S, Goldstein A
Demography. 1981 Feb;18(1):67-83.
New approaches must be developed and tested to meet the needs for current data on population movement. One such approach is the survey with multiplicity (social networks). It allows respondents to report events (in this case, migration) that occurred to specified relatives living elsewhere. In order to test the value of the approach on a limited, exploratory basis, a two-stage research design was employed. A sample of persons resident in Cranston, Rhode Island who had changed address in the three years preceding the survey, was first identified and information was gathered in Round I on their mobility and on their relatives living in the State. In turn, these relatives (Round II) were asked about the mobility of their parents, siblings, and children. (The responses from Round II should have included the migrants in Round I.) Evaluation of the accuracy of Round II responses in comparison to those obtained in Round I was undertaken in terms of kin relationships, recency of move, and type of move. The results indicate that respondents had a low awareness of their relatives' movements, that moves of females were more likely to be reported than those of males, that recent moves were more frequently cited and that moves between communities were more likely to be reported than intracity mobility.
必须开发并测试新方法,以满足对当前人口流动数据的需求。一种这样的方法是多重性调查(社交网络)。它允许受访者报告发生在居住在其他地方的特定亲属身上的事件(在这种情况下是迁移)。为了在有限的探索基础上测试该方法的价值,采用了两阶段研究设计。首先确定了罗德岛克兰斯顿的居民样本,这些居民在调查前三年中更改了地址,并在第一轮收集了他们的流动性以及他们在该州居住的亲属的信息。接着,这些亲属(第二轮)被问及他们父母、兄弟姐妹和子女的流动性。(第二轮的回答应该包括第一轮中的移民。)根据亲属关系、迁移时间和迁移类型,对第二轮回答与第一轮回答的准确性进行了评估。结果表明,受访者对其亲属的迁移情况了解程度较低,女性的迁移比男性的迁移更有可能被报告,近期的迁移被提及的频率更高,而且社区之间的迁移比市内迁移更有可能被报告。