Ott R S, Braun W F, Lock T F, Memon M A, Stowater J L
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1981 Apr 1;178(7):730-1.
Two methods of pregnancy diagnosis--rectal abdominal palpation and the intrarectal Doppler technique--were compared for accuracy in the female goat (does). Three veterinarians were given a short period of instruction as to the use of these methods, after which 38 does were evaluated by both methods by each veterinarian. The percentage of correct determination for pregnant does ranged from 94% to 100% for examiners using the intrarectal Doppler technique and from 94% to 97% for the rectal abdominal palpation. The percentage of correct determinations for nonpregnant does ranged from 25% to 75% for intrarectal Doppler technique and was 75% for rectal abdominal palpation; however, the number of nonpregnant does was small and did not allow a valid conclusion. The results indicated that both methods are reasonably accurate for pregnancy diagnosis in does at 55 days or more after breeding and can be learned with only brief training. However, rectal abdominal palpation appears to be more hazardous with respect to rectal injury and abortion and, therefore, would not be the preferred method.
对雌性山羊(母羊)采用两种妊娠诊断方法——直肠腹部触诊法和直肠内多普勒技术——进行准确性比较。三位兽医接受了关于这两种方法使用的短期培训,之后每位兽医使用这两种方法对38只母羊进行评估。使用直肠内多普勒技术的检查人员对妊娠母羊的正确判定百分比为94%至100%,直肠腹部触诊法为94%至97%。直肠内多普勒技术对未妊娠母羊的正确判定百分比为25%至75%,直肠腹部触诊法为75%;然而,未妊娠母羊数量较少,无法得出有效结论。结果表明,在配种后55天或更长时间,这两种方法对母羊妊娠诊断都相当准确,只需简短培训就能学会。然而,直肠腹部触诊在直肠损伤和流产方面似乎风险更大,因此不是首选方法。