• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过声学分析预测辅音混淆。

Predicting consonant confusions from acoustic analysis.

作者信息

Dubno J R, Levitt H

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 1981 Jan;69(1):249-61. doi: 10.1121/1.385345.

DOI:10.1121/1.385345
PMID:7217523
Abstract

Acoustic measurements of nonsense syllables in quiet and in noise were used to predict the pattern of consonant confusions made under those conditions. Eleven sets of nonsense syllables were presented to normal-hearing subjects in quiet and at a +5 dB speech-to-noise ratio, at five speech levels. A set of acoustic characteristics of the speech stimuli were chosen for analysis and measured using digital processing techniques. Results of the recognition task revealed significant effects of consonant voicing, position and vowel context on syllable recognition. The performance-intensity function of the quiet condition rises more steeply than the function obtained in noise. The effect of noise on consonant recognition is dependent upon the manner in which the consonant is produced, and the location of maximum constriction. Differences in the absolute values of the acoustic parameters of syllable pairs were used to predict their percentage of confusion. A set of acoustic variables was isolated which was found to be the best predictor of confusion percentages. Although the sets of acoustic variables were different for various syllable types and test conditions, three variables (consonant energy, consonant spectral peaks, consonant-to-noise ratio) were used in a majority of the predictions.

摘要

通过对无意义音节在安静环境和噪声环境下进行声学测量,来预测在这些条件下产生的辅音混淆模式。向听力正常的受试者在安静环境以及信噪比为 +5 dB 的情况下,以五种语音强度呈现了十一组无意义音节。选择了一组语音刺激的声学特征进行分析,并使用数字处理技术进行测量。识别任务的结果显示,辅音的浊音性、位置和元音语境对音节识别有显著影响。安静环境下的性能 - 强度函数比在噪声环境中获得的函数上升得更陡峭。噪声对辅音识别的影响取决于辅音的发音方式以及最大收缩的位置。音节对声学参数绝对值的差异被用于预测它们的混淆百分比。分离出了一组声学变量,发现它们是混淆百分比的最佳预测指标。尽管对于不同的音节类型和测试条件,声学变量集有所不同,但在大多数预测中使用了三个变量(辅音能量、辅音频谱峰值、辅音与噪声的比率)。

相似文献

1
Predicting consonant confusions from acoustic analysis.通过声学分析预测辅音混淆。
J Acoust Soc Am. 1981 Jan;69(1):249-61. doi: 10.1121/1.385345.
2
Recognition of natural and time/intensity altered CVs by young and elderly subjects with normal hearing.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1986 Dec;80(6):1599-607. doi: 10.1121/1.394324.
3
Interactive factors in consonant confusion patterns.辅音混淆模式中的交互因素。
J Acoust Soc Am. 1989 Jan;85(1):339-46. doi: 10.1121/1.397685.
4
Consonant confusions in white noise.白噪声中的辅音混淆。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Aug;124(2):1220-33. doi: 10.1121/1.2913251.
5
Contribution of spectrotemporal features on auditory event-related potentials elicited by consonant-vowel syllables.协同元音诱发听觉事件相关电位的频谱时域特征贡献。
Ear Hear. 2009 Dec;30(6):704-12. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181b1d42d.
6
Recognition of digitized CV syllables in multitalker babble.
Audiology. 1985;24(4):241-53. doi: 10.3109/00206098509070108.
7
Effects of Simulated Hearing Loss on Bilingual Children's Consonant Recognition in Noise.模拟听力损失对双语儿童噪声中辅音识别的影响。
Ear Hear. 2017 Sep/Oct;38(5):e292-e304. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000428.
8
Consonant identification in consonant-vowel-consonant syllables in speech-spectrum noise.在语音噪声中的辅音-元音-辅音音节中进行辅音识别。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Mar;127(3):1609-23. doi: 10.1121/1.3293005.
9
Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.元音语境对人工耳蜗使用者识别词首和词中辅音的影响。
Ear Hear. 2006 Dec;27(6):658-77. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000240543.31567.54.
10
Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.噪声环境下语音识别与频谱通道数量的关系:声学听力与人工耳蜗的比较
J Acoust Soc Am. 2001 Aug;110(2):1150-63. doi: 10.1121/1.1381538.

引用本文的文献

1
The Influence of Vowels on the Identification of Spoken Disyllabic Words in the Malayalam Language for Individuals with Hearing Loss.元音对马拉雅拉姆语中听力损失者口语双音节词识别的影响
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Nov 30;14(23):2707. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14232707.
2
A Phoneme-Scale Assessment of Multichannel Speech Enhancement Algorithms.多通道语音增强算法的音素级评估
Trends Hear. 2024 Jan-Dec;28:23312165241292205. doi: 10.1177/23312165241292205.
3
Adaptive Syllable Training Improves Phoneme Identification in Older Listeners with and without Hearing Loss.
适应性音节训练可改善有听力损失和无听力损失的老年听众的音素识别能力。
Audiol Res. 2022 Nov 18;12(6):653-673. doi: 10.3390/audiolres12060063.
4
Phonological and semantic similarity of misperceived words in babble: Effects of sentence context, age, and hearing loss.语音和语义相似性对背景噪声中听错词的影响:句子语境、年龄和听力损失的作用。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2022 Jan;151(1):650. doi: 10.1121/10.0009367.
5
Effect of the Target and Conflicting Frequency and Time Ranges on Consonant Enhancement in Normal-Hearing Listeners.目标频率、冲突频率和时间范围对正常听力受试者辅音增强的影响。
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 15;12:733100. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.733100. eCollection 2021.
6
Older adult recognition error patterns when listening to interrupted speech and speech in steady-state noise.老年人在听中断的言语和稳态噪声中的言语时的识别错误模式。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2021 Nov;150(5):3428. doi: 10.1121/10.0006975.
7
Speech Categorization Reveals the Role of Early-Stage Temporal-Coherence Processing in Auditory Scene Analysis.言语分类揭示了早期时间相干性处理在听觉场景分析中的作用。
J Neurosci. 2022 Jan 12;42(2):240-254. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1610-21.2021. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
8
Listening Effort Is Not the Same as Speech Intelligibility Score.听力努力程度与言语可懂度评分不同。
Trends Hear. 2021 Jan-Dec;25:23312165211027688. doi: 10.1177/23312165211027688.
9
Vowel Context Effect on the Perception of Stop Consonants in Malayalam and Its Role in Determining Syllable Frequency.元音语境对马拉雅拉姆语中塞音感知的影响及其在确定音节频率中的作用。
J Audiol Otol. 2021 Jul;25(3):124-130. doi: 10.7874/jao.2021.00087. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
10
Forward and Backward Masking of Consonants in School-Age Children and Adults.儿童和成人的辅音前向掩蔽和后向掩蔽。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 Jul 13;61(7):1807-1814. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-H-17-0403.