Chang A, Kelso G, Harris M, Jordan A
West J Med. 1981 Feb;134(2):181-5.
Because child day-care regulations exclude ill children, parents are frequently faced with problems in finding an alternative care arrangement. This pilot study compares home care of mildly ill children by parents (46 preschool children) with care by trained home workers (23 preschool children) during 20 weeks in 1977. Episodes of illness in children cared for by trained home workers showed a slightly shorter duration (median 3.0 days, range 2 to 11 days versus median 5.2 days, range 2 to 14 days) and a less severe course (fewer and milder signs of illness) when compared with episodes of illness in children cared for by parents. Other selected activities involved in the management of the mildly ill children were comparable. Although larger studies are needed, it appears that if parents desire an alternative care arrangement for their children during mild illness, care by a trained home worker may be convenient and safe.
由于儿童日托规定禁止患病儿童入托,家长们常常面临寻找替代照料安排的难题。这项试点研究比较了1977年20周内,家长对病情较轻儿童的家庭护理(46名学龄前儿童)与专业家庭护理人员的护理(23名学龄前儿童)。与家长护理的患病儿童相比,专业家庭护理人员护理的患病儿童病程略短(中位数3.0天,范围2至11天,家长护理的中位数为5.2天,范围2至14天),病情发展也较轻(疾病症状更少、更轻)。其他涉及病情较轻儿童管理的选定活动则相当。尽管需要开展更大规模的研究,但如果家长希望在孩子病情较轻时能有替代照料安排,专业家庭护理人员的护理似乎既方便又安全。