McMahon R C, Kunce J T
J Clin Psychol. 1981 Apr;37(2):408-10. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198104)37:2<408::aid-jclp2270370235>3.0.co;2-i.
Compared the factor structure of the WISC and WISC-R obtained in samples of children (N = 187) with various neuropsychological diagnoses with that obtained in Kaufman's study of the WISC-R standardization group. The relationships between WISC and WISC-R records scored in a manner consistent with the obtained factor structure, and the interdisciplinary diagnoses assigned children in both groups also were studied. It was found that the WISC and WISC-R factor structure obtained in both the samples including exceptional children was essentially comparable to that reported by Kaufman. Relationships between WISC and WISC-R factor scores and interdisciplinary diagnoses assigned children in both samples were weak, but generally consistent with expectations.
将在患有各种神经心理诊断的儿童样本(N = 187)中获得的韦氏儿童智力量表(WISC)和韦氏儿童智力量表修订版(WISC - R)的因素结构,与考夫曼对WISC - R标准化组的研究所获得的因素结构进行比较。还研究了以与获得的因素结构一致的方式评分的WISC和WISC - R记录之间的关系,以及两组中分配给儿童的跨学科诊断。结果发现,在包括特殊儿童在内的两个样本中获得的WISC和WISC - R因素结构与考夫曼报告的基本相当。两个样本中WISC和WISC - R因素得分与分配给儿童的跨学科诊断之间的关系较弱,但总体上与预期一致。