Parkinson B, Manstead A S
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1981 Feb;40(2):239-45. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.40.2.239.
This study assesses the role played by the variables of meaning and attention in mediating the cognitive effects of false autonomic feedback, first reported by Valins. In the context of a study of the physiological correlates of selective attention, subjects were instructed either to attend or to ignore pulsed sounds that were described either as veridical heart rate feedback or simply as electronic "bleeps." These auditory stimuli were presented in parallel with slides illustrating skin diseases. Consistent with previous findings, slides associated with acceleration of the pulsed sounds were subsequently rated as significantly more unpleasant than those associated with no change in the speed of these sounds. However, this effect was not contingent on the apparent meaning of these sounds (heart rate vs bleeps) but was contingent on the degree of attention paid to the sounds. The "Valins effect" was only obtained when subjected attended to the sounds. The implications of these findings for the interpretation of the cognitive effects of false autonomic feedback are discussed.
本研究评估了意义和注意力变量在介导虚假自主反馈的认知效应中所起的作用,这一效应最早由瓦林斯报道。在一项关于选择性注意的生理相关性研究中,受试者被指示要么关注要么忽略被描述为真实心率反馈或仅仅是电子“哔哔声”的脉冲声音。这些听觉刺激与展示皮肤病的幻灯片同时呈现。与先前的研究结果一致,与脉冲声音加速相关的幻灯片随后被评为比那些与这些声音速度无变化相关的幻灯片明显更令人不快。然而,这种效应并不取决于这些声音的表面意义(心率与哔哔声),而是取决于对声音的关注程度。只有当受试者关注这些声音时,才会出现“瓦林斯效应”。本文讨论了这些发现对解释虚假自主反馈的认知效应的意义。