Swanson L, O'Connor L
J Psychol. 1981 Mar;107 pt 2:231-6. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1981.9915227.
The present study addressed the question, "To what extent does nonstrategic verbal encoding differ in deaf and normally hearing children?" With the use of a probe-type serial memory task, hearing and deaf children matched on chronological age, IQ, and sex were randomly assigned to named, unnamed, or dactylo-kinesthetic (fingerspelled) stimulus pretraining conditions and compared on subsequent serial recall performance. Strong primacy effects were found even though children could not use overt cumulative rehearsal. Analysis of d' scores found no difference between hearing or deaf children on pretrained named instruction; overall inferior recall occurred for deaf children on unnamed condition. Results were interpreted in terms of comparable nonstrategic processes in deaf children that occur prior to the application of mnemonic strategies.
本研究探讨了“聋童和听力正常儿童的非策略性言语编码在多大程度上存在差异?”这一问题。通过使用一种探测式系列记忆任务,将在年龄、智商和性别上匹配的听力正常儿童和聋童随机分配到命名、未命名或触觉动觉(手指拼写)刺激预训练条件下,并比较他们随后的系列回忆表现。尽管儿童无法使用明显的累积复述,但仍发现了强烈的首因效应。对d'分数的分析发现,在预训练的命名指令上,听力正常儿童和聋童之间没有差异;在未命名条件下,聋童的总体回忆较差。研究结果根据聋童在应用记忆策略之前发生的类似非策略性过程进行了解释。