Bonvillian J D
Percept Mot Skills. 1983 Jun;56(3):775-91. doi: 10.2466/pms.1983.56.3.775.
This study examined 40 deaf and 20 hearing students' free recall of visually presented words varied systematically with respect to signability (i.e., words that could be expressed by a single sign) and visual imagery. Half of the deaf subjects had deaf parents, while the other half had hearing parents. For deaf students, recall was better for words that had sign-language equivalents and high-imagery values. For the hearing students, recall was better for words with high-imagery values, but there was no effect of signability. Over-all, the hearing students recalled significantly more words than the deaf students in both immediate and delayed free-recall conditions. In immediate recall, deaf students with deaf parents reported using a sign-language coding strategy more frequently and recalled more words correctly than deaf students with hearing parents. Serial-position curves indicated several differences in patterns of recall among the groups. These results underline the importance of sign language in the memory and recall of deaf persons.
本研究考察了40名聋生和20名听力正常学生对视觉呈现单词的自由回忆情况,这些单词在可手语表达性(即能用单个手势表达的单词)和视觉意象方面有系统变化。一半聋生的父母是聋人,另一半聋生的父母是听力正常的人。对于聋生来说,对等手语表达且具有高意象值的单词回忆效果更好。对于听力正常的学生来说,具有高意象值的单词回忆效果更好,但可手语表达性没有影响。总体而言,在即时和延迟自由回忆条件下,听力正常的学生比聋生回忆出的单词显著更多。在即时回忆中,父母是聋人的聋生报告使用手语编码策略的频率更高,且比父母是听力正常的聋生正确回忆出的单词更多。系列位置曲线表明各群体在回忆模式上存在若干差异。这些结果突显了手语在聋人记忆和回忆中的重要性。