Ory M G, Earp J A
Public Health Rep. 1981 May-Jun;96(3):238-45.
A secondary analysis of 100 cases histories selected from social service records in a county department of social services (DSS) was conducted to examine the amount and kind of social services that persons identified as having maltreated a child received. Other objectives of the analysis were to observe the pattern of social service utilization over time and to discover what, if any, factors were associated with receiving social services. To accomplish these study objectives, two groups were selected for analysis: a target group of 50 families that had been reported to the county DSS for child maltreatment and a group of 50 families that had never been so reported. Both groups were composed mainly of young and socioeconomically deprived families that were characterized by poor incomes, little education, and low occupational levels. Analyses revealed significant differences in the amount and type of social services used by families in the target group and the comparison group. Although family structure was found to be related to the total amount of social service utilization, the degree of social disorganization within the family did not correlate with utilization. The study results indicate that the level of social services that protective service clients need and the level that they are actually getting should be re-examined.
对从一个县社会服务部(DSS)的社会服务记录中选取的100个案例进行了二次分析,以研究被认定虐待儿童的人所接受的社会服务的数量和种类。该分析的其他目的是观察社会服务随时间的使用模式,并发现哪些因素(如果有的话)与接受社会服务有关。为实现这些研究目标,选取了两组进行分析:一组是向县DSS报告过虐待儿童情况的50个家庭作为目标组,另一组是从未报告过此类情况的50个家庭。两组主要都由年轻且社会经济贫困的家庭组成,其特点是收入低、教育程度低和职业水平低。分析显示,目标组家庭和对照组家庭在使用社会服务的数量和类型上存在显著差异。虽然发现家庭结构与社会服务利用总量有关,但家庭内部的社会混乱程度与利用情况并无关联。研究结果表明,应重新审视保护性服务对象所需的社会服务水平以及他们实际获得的社会服务水平。