Suppr超能文献

用于测量局部脑血流量的氢清除法与微球技术的比较。

Comparison between hydrogen clearance and microsphere technique for rCBF measurement.

作者信息

Heiss W D, Traupe H

出版信息

Stroke. 1981 Mar-Apr;12(2):161-7. doi: 10.1161/01.str.12.2.161.

Abstract

Regional cerebral blood flow was measured repeatedly in anesthetized and immobilized cats under various experimental conditions by recording the clearance of inhaled hydrogen with inserted platinum electrodes and by recording the distribution of 15 mu microspheres labeled with 3 different radioisotopes. The values for both methods in normal cortical tissue were comparable (75.7 +/- 23.5 ml/100 g min for H2-clearance; 67.6 +/- 26.2 ml/100 g min for microsphere technique), but were below those recorded in awake cats. With both methods the values could be reliably reproduced (correlation coefficient between measurements: 0.903 for H2-clearance, 0.754 for microsphere technique). During ischemia induced by temporary occlusion of the middle cerebral artery the microsphere technique usually yielded higher flow values than the H2-clearance, and did not indicate severe ischemia in 6 out of 20 instances. After restoration of flow, hyperperfusion was observed by the microsphere technique in 2 cases only while H2-clearance indicated hyperemia in 6 instances. This limited comparability between the 2 methods was also expressed in a low correlation coefficient (0.486) calculated from 139 flow values obtained simultaneously with both methods. The discrepancy between the methods under pathological conditions might be due mainly to the different recording volumes: while Pt-electrodes record H2-clearance from a few mm3 or less, tissue samples of 300-700 mg were necessary for the microsphere technique and inhomogeneities of flow may thereby escape detection. The technique for measuring cerebral blood flow in an experimental setup should be selected according to the requirements of the study and according to the limitations of the various methods.

摘要

在各种实验条件下,通过插入铂电极记录吸入氢气的清除率以及记录用3种不同放射性同位素标记的15微米微球的分布,对麻醉和固定的猫反复测量局部脑血流量。正常皮质组织中两种方法得到的值具有可比性(氢气清除法为75.7±23.5毫升/100克·分钟;微球技术为67.6±26.2毫升/100克·分钟),但低于清醒猫的记录值。两种方法的值都能可靠地重现(测量值之间的相关系数:氢气清除法为0.903,微球技术为0.754)。在大脑中动脉临时闭塞诱导的缺血期间,微球技术通常产生比氢气清除法更高的血流值,并且在20例中有6例未显示严重缺血。血流恢复后,微球技术仅在2例中观察到高灌注,而氢气清除法在6例中显示充血。两种方法之间这种有限的可比性也体现在根据两种方法同时获得的139个血流值计算出的低相关系数(0.486)中。病理条件下两种方法之间的差异可能主要归因于不同的记录体积:铂电极记录的是几立方毫米或更小体积内的氢气清除率,而微球技术需要300 - 700毫克的组织样本,可能因此遗漏血流的不均匀性检测。在实验装置中测量脑血流量的技术应根据研究要求和各种方法的局限性来选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验