Suppr超能文献

叶酸吸收试验与其他吸收不良实验室检查的比较。

The folic acid absorption test compared with other laboratory tests for malabsorption.

作者信息

Elsborg L

出版信息

Acta Med Scand. 1981;209(4):323-5. doi: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1981.tb11600.x.

Abstract

In 25 patients with malabsorption, the folic acid urinary excretion (TRIFA) test was compared with the degree of steatorrhoea, the Schilling test, and the D-xylose test. No correlation was found between the faecal lipid excretion, the Schilling test, and the TRIFA test, whereas the TRIFA test did correlate fairly well with the D-xylose test. It is concluded that the TRIFA test does not replace estimations of faecal lipid excretions in the diagnosis of intestinal malabsorption. As it mainly supplies information about absorptional capacity in the upper small bowel, it is complementary to the Schilling test, which chiefly measures the absorption in the lower intestine. Finally, the TRIFA test has several advantages over the D-xylose test in practical clinical use.

摘要

对25例吸收不良患者,将叶酸尿排泄(TRIFA)试验与脂肪泻程度、希林试验及D-木糖试验进行了比较。粪便脂质排泄、希林试验与TRIFA试验之间未发现相关性,而TRIFA试验与D-木糖试验相关性较好。结论是,在肠道吸收不良的诊断中,TRIFA试验不能替代粪便脂质排泄的测定。由于它主要提供有关上段小肠吸收能力的信息,因此是对主要测定下段小肠吸收情况的希林试验的补充。最后,在实际临床应用中,TRIFA试验比D-木糖试验有几个优点。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验