Suppr超能文献

通过气囊传感器和微型电子传感器测量的轮椅坐垫坐姿压力比较。

A comparison of sitting pressures on wheelchair cushions as measured by air cell transducers and miniature electronic transducers.

作者信息

Palmieri V R, Haelen G T, Cochran G V

出版信息

Bull Prosthet Res. 1980 Spring;10-33:5-8.

PMID:7236945
Abstract

With increasing attention to cushion selection for patients subject to decubitus ulcers, greater efforts are being made to prescribe cushions based on individual need. Pressure measurements during sitting frequently are utilized as a clinical guide to the process of selection and fitting. To determine the relationship between pressure values recorded from different types of transducers, simultaneous measurements were made beneath the ischial tuberosities using a Scimedics air cell transducer on one side and a matrix of 5 Kulite electronic transducers on the other side of a subject while sitting on a series of 21 commercially available wheelchair cushions. Although these transducers are different in structure and function, statistically similar results were obtained. The air cell type of transducer appear to be more appropriate for routine clinical use, but caution is advised regarding interpretation of results in terms of absolute pressures due to the many variables involved -- these techniques are suitable primarily for comparative measurements to obtain the optimal seating support for a given patient.

摘要

随着对压疮患者坐垫选择的关注度不断提高,人们正更加努力地根据个体需求来开具坐垫处方。坐位时的压力测量常常被用作选择和适配过程的临床指南。为了确定不同类型传感器记录的压力值之间的关系,让一名受试者坐在21种市售轮椅坐垫上,同时在其坐骨结节下方进行测量,一侧使用Scimedics气囊式传感器,另一侧使用由5个Kulite电子传感器组成的矩阵。尽管这些传感器在结构和功能上有所不同,但在统计学上得到了相似的结果。气囊式传感器似乎更适合常规临床使用,但由于涉及诸多变量,在解释绝对压力结果时需谨慎——这些技术主要适用于比较测量,以便为特定患者获得最佳的座位支撑。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验