Krupka R M, Devés R
J Biol Chem. 1981 Jun 10;256(11):5410-6.
Numerous mechanisms have been suggested to explain transport across biological membranes, all of which fall into one or the other of two distinct categories. In some, substrate sites in the free carrier are simultaneously exposed on the two membrane surfaces, while in others a substrate site is alternately exposed on opposite sides. Either group could account for active and facilitated transport, as well as for accelerated exchange, countertransport, and hyperbolic substrate saturation curves. A simple kinetic test is described here which distinguishes between these two classes. The test depends on measurements of transport rates in the presence of reversible competitive inhibitors inside and outside the cell. Experiments are reported on the glucose system of erythrocytes involving the inhibitors phloretin and cytochalasin B, and on the choline system of the same cells, with the nontransported substrate analogs dimethyl-n-pentyl(2-hydroxyethyl)ammonium ion and 2-di-butylaminoethanol. The results are in agreement with the single site-exposure models, which include the classical carrier, and incompatible with the dual site-exposure models. The mechanisms in the latter group are therefore rejected as explanations for glucose or choline transport.
人们已经提出了许多机制来解释物质跨生物膜的运输,所有这些机制都可归入两个不同类别的其中之一。在某些机制中,自由载体上的底物位点同时暴露于膜的两个表面,而在其他机制中,底物位点交替暴露于相对的两侧。这两类机制都可以解释主动运输和易化运输,以及加速交换、逆向运输和双曲线型底物饱和曲线。本文描述了一种简单的动力学测试方法,可区分这两类机制。该测试取决于在细胞内外存在可逆竞争性抑制剂的情况下对运输速率的测量。本文报道了关于红细胞葡萄糖系统的实验,涉及抑制剂根皮素和细胞松弛素B,以及关于同一细胞胆碱系统的实验,使用了非转运底物类似物二甲基正戊基(2-羟乙基)铵离子和2-二丁基氨基乙醇。结果与单一位点暴露模型相符,该模型包括经典载体,而与双位点暴露模型不相符。因此,后一组机制被排除作为葡萄糖或胆碱运输的解释。