Saunders G R, Schuckit M A
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1981 Jul;169(7):456-8. doi: 10.1097/00005053-198107000-00007.
The MacAndrew (A Mac), Rosenberg (A Ros), and Revised (A Rev) "alcoholic scales" of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory were administered to 30 nonalcoholic men aged 20 to 25 who have a first-degree alcoholic family member (the family history positive, or FHP, group). Those scores were then compared to a control population matched on demography and drinking history but lacking a family history of alcoholism (the family history negative, or FHN, group). Although the two groups did not differ on the total score made up of all 81 items common to the three scales and scores were almost identical on the A Ros and A Rev scales, the FHP subjects scored an average of 18.86 (SD = 4.08) whereas FHN controls scored 16.82 (SD = 3.24) on the A Mac scale (p less than .05). The two groups differed on only one of the six A Mac subfactors, Interpersonal Competence, with the former scoring 4.29 (SD = 1.51) and the later 3.25 (SD = 1.35) (p less than .05). Although the results on the A Mac are consistent with the possibility of some personality differences between individuals at high risk for the future development of alcoholism and controls, the fact that both groups scored in the "normal range" and the very small numerical differential between FHP and FHN individuals indicate the test is of limited clinical significance. However, the scores may indicate the presence of some aspects of personality which might correlate with greater likelihood for the future development of alcoholism.
明尼苏达多相人格调查表的麦安德鲁(A Mac)、罗森伯格(A Ros)和修订版(A Rev)“酒精量表”被施用于30名年龄在20至25岁之间的非酒精成瘾男性,这些男性有一位一级亲属是酒精成瘾者(家族史阳性,或FHP组)。然后将这些分数与在人口统计学和饮酒史方面匹配但没有酒精成瘾家族史的对照组(家族史阴性,或FHN组)进行比较。尽管两组在由三个量表共有的所有81个项目组成的总分上没有差异,并且在A Ros和A Rev量表上的分数几乎相同,但在A Mac量表上,FHP组受试者的平均得分为18.86(标准差 = 4.08),而FHN对照组的平均得分为16.82(标准差 = 3.24)(p小于0.05)。两组在A Mac的六个子因素中仅在一个因素,即人际能力上存在差异,前者得分为4.29(标准差 = 1.51),后者得分为3.25(标准差 = 1.35)(p小于0.05)。尽管A Mac量表的结果与未来有酒精成瘾高风险个体和对照组之间存在某些人格差异的可能性一致,但两组得分均在“正常范围”以及FHP和FHN个体之间非常小的数值差异这一事实表明该测试的临床意义有限。然而,这些分数可能表明存在某些人格方面,这些方面可能与未来酒精成瘾的更大可能性相关。