• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

四种眼眶骨折切口的随机对照比较。

A randomized comparison of four incisions for orbital fractures.

作者信息

Holtmann B, Wray R C, Little A G

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 1981 Jun;67(6):731-7. doi: 10.1097/00006534-198106000-00003.

DOI:10.1097/00006534-198106000-00003
PMID:7243973
Abstract

We previously compared conjunctival and subciliary incisions for exposure of orbital floor and infraorbital rim fractures. A prospective randomized comparison of lower eyelid and orbital rim incisions was then undertaken and results compared with our previous study. Lower eyelid and orbital rim incisions provided more rapid access to fracture sites. Fracture exposure was adequate with all but conjunctival incisions; lateral canthotomy was added in 56 percent of cases to improve exposure. There were minimal or no intraoperative and postoperative complications except for a 42 percent incidence of ectropion following subciliary incisions. Scar appearance was similar in the four groups, except when an isolated conjunctival incision was used, which produced an invisible scar.

摘要

我们之前比较了结膜切口和睑缘下切口用于暴露眶底和眶下缘骨折的情况。随后对下睑和眶缘切口进行了前瞻性随机比较,并将结果与我们之前的研究进行对比。下睑和眶缘切口能更快速地到达骨折部位。除结膜切口外,其他切口的骨折暴露情况均良好;56%的病例中增加了外眦切开术以改善暴露。除睑缘下切口后42%的睑外翻发生率外,术中及术后并发症极少或无。除了单独使用结膜切口产生不可见瘢痕外,四组的瘢痕外观相似。

相似文献

1
A randomized comparison of four incisions for orbital fractures.四种眼眶骨折切口的随机对照比较。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1981 Jun;67(6):731-7. doi: 10.1097/00006534-198106000-00003.
2
The incidence of lower eyelid malposition after facial fracture repair: a retrospective study and meta-analysis comparing subtarsal, subciliary, and transconjunctival incisions.下眼睑位置异常在面部骨折修复后的发生率:一项比较经皮入路、经睑缘下和经结膜入路的回顾性研究和荟萃分析。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Nov;124(5):1578-1586. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181babb3d.
3
[Esthetic incisions in traumatology involving the mid-face region].
HNO. 1994 Aug;42(8):488-92.
4
Comparison of transcutaneous incisions used for exposure of the infraorbital rim and orbital floor: a retrospective study.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992 Oct;90(4):585-91. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199210000-00006.
5
Anthropometric changes in the morphology of the lower eyelid after using three different approaches in patients with orbital fractures.眶壁骨折患者采用三种不同方法治疗后面下部形态的人体测量学变化。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2020 Oct;48(10):985-993. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2020.08.002. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
6
A comparison of conjunctival and subciliary incisions for orbital fractures.
Br J Plast Surg. 1977 Apr;30(2):142-5. doi: 10.1016/0007-1226(77)90009-1.
7
Lower Eyelid Complications in Facial Fracture Surgery.面部骨折手术中的下眼睑并发症
J Craniofac Surg. 2017 Mar;28(2):391-393. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003314.
8
Comparison of various approaches for exposure of infraorbital rim fractures of zygoma.颧骨眶下缘骨折不同暴露方法的比较
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2009 Jun;8(2):99-102. doi: 10.1007/s12663-009-0026-7. Epub 2009 Aug 11.
9
Transconjunctival versus subciliary approach to the infraorbital margin for open reduction of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures: a randomized feasibility study.经结膜与经睫下入路至眶下缘用于颧骨上颌骨复合体骨折切开复位:一项随机可行性研究
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Jun;21(2):187-192. doi: 10.1007/s10006-017-0617-2. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
10
Lower blepharoplasty post-orbicularis approach to the orbit--a prospective study.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1987 Oct;25(5):398-401. doi: 10.1016/0266-4356(87)90089-1.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comparative Analytical Study of Functional and Esthetic Outcomes of Infraorbital and Subciliary Incisions to Assess the Redundancy of the Infraorbital Approach.一项关于眶下切口和睫毛下切口功能及美学效果的比较分析研究,以评估眶下入路的冗余性
ScientificWorldJournal. 2025 Feb 10;2025:9595176. doi: 10.1155/tswj/9595176. eCollection 2025.
2
Trans-tarsal Stair-Step Technique for Lateral Extension of the Transconjunctival Incision: A Technical Note and Case Series.经结膜切口外侧延伸的经跗骨阶梯技术:技术说明与病例系列
Eplasty. 2024 Apr 26;24:e22. eCollection 2024.
3
Comparison of Transconjunctival versus Subtarsal Approach in Orbital Reconstruction with Respect to Post-Operative Complications and Aesthetic Outcome - A Systematic Review.
经结膜入路与睑板下入路在眼眶重建中术后并发症及美学效果的比较——一项系统评价
Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2023 Jan-Jun;13(1):81-87. doi: 10.4103/ams.ams_41_23. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
4
Zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures: finding the least complicated surgical approach (A Randomized Clinical Trial).颧骨-上颌骨复合体骨折:寻找最简单的手术入路(一项随机临床试验)。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Aug 4;23(1):539. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03249-8.
5
Feasibility of Laterocaudal Approach in Comparison with Subtarsal Approach in the Management of Orbital Rim Fractures in Indian Population: A Prospective Study.印度人群眶缘骨折治疗中后外侧入路与跗下窦入路的可行性比较:一项前瞻性研究
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2023 Sep;22(3):661-665. doi: 10.1007/s12663-022-01805-3. Epub 2022 Oct 5.
6
Management of Infraorbital Rim Fracture Through Intraoral Approach.经口内入路治疗眶下缘骨折
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2022 Sep;21(3):911-915. doi: 10.1007/s12663-021-01566-5. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
7
Controversies and Contemporary Management of Orbital Floor Fractures.眶底骨折的争议与现代治疗
Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2022 Sep;15(3):237-245. doi: 10.1177/19433875211026430. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
8
Retrospective Analysis of Subtarsal Incision in Maxillofacial Trauma.颌面创伤中跗下切口的回顾性分析
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2020 Sep;19(3):443-446. doi: 10.1007/s12663-019-01302-0. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
9
Surgical Approach to Orbital Floor Fractures: Comparing Complication Rates Between Subciliary and Subconjunctival Approaches.眼眶底骨折的手术入路:比较睫下和结膜下入路的并发症发生率
Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2020 Mar;13(1):45-48. doi: 10.1177/1943387520904893. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
10
Isolated Orbital Floor Fracture Management: A Survey and Comparison of American Oculofacial and Facial Plastic Surgeon Preferences.孤立性眶底骨折的处理:美国眼面部和面部整形外科医生偏好的调查与比较
Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2019 Jun;12(2):112-121. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1639350. Epub 2018 Apr 9.