Zautra A, Young D M, Guenther R T
Am J Community Psychol. 1981 Apr;9(2):209-24. doi: 10.1007/BF00896368.
Blame attributions were studied as indicators of tension between a person and his/her psychosocial resources. An eight-item blame scale was constructed to tap the areas of one's life about which a person made causal attributions to explain misfortune. This scale along with other measures was administered through household surveys to two samples of 537 and 185 community residents. Consistent with the predictions of the study, demographic groups with fewer social resources had higher blame scores, and residents reporting more stressful life events were more likely to blame. As expected, blame attributions were positively correlated with three measures of maladjustment and were unrelated to a separate measure of positive well-being. Discontent with social life, followed by financial situation, family life, and life opportunity blame, were consistently related to reports of maladjustment. Self-blame, however, was only marginally associated with poor adjustment. The same findings were obtained for two divergent samples of residents, suggesting that the relationships obtained here have considerable generalizability.
归因被作为一个人与他/她的社会心理资源之间紧张关系的指标进行研究。构建了一个包含八个条目的归因量表,以挖掘一个人对生活中哪些方面进行因果归因来解释不幸事件。该量表与其他测量工具一起通过家庭调查施用于两个样本,分别为537名和185名社区居民。与研究预测一致,社会资源较少的人口群体归因得分较高,报告生活压力事件较多的居民更倾向于进行归因。正如预期的那样,归因与三种适应不良的测量指标呈正相关,与一项单独的积极幸福感测量指标无关。对社会生活的不满,其次是对财务状况、家庭生活和生活机会的归因,始终与适应不良的报告相关。然而,自我归因仅与适应不良存在微弱关联。在两个不同的居民样本中都得到了相同的结果,表明这里得到的关系具有相当的普遍性。