Royeen C B, Lesinski G, Ciani S, Schneider D
Am J Occup Ther. 1981 Jul;35(7):443-50. doi: 10.5014/ajot.35.7.443.
A preliminary investigation was conducted into the relationship of the Southern California Sensory Integration Tests (SCSIT), the Southern California Postrotary Nystagmus Test (SCPNT), and clinical observations accompanying these tests to evaluations in otolaryngolgoy, ophthalmology, and audiology, ophthalmology, and audiology. The subjects were two children with vestibularly based sensory integrative dysfunction. The results revealed that there was no agreement between the results of the SCPNT and the otolaryngological evaluation. There was some agreement between the ophthalmology evaluation and the clinical observations accompanying the SCSIT. Both subjects scored poorly in two areas of auditory processing. Possible reasons for these results are discussed as well as implications for occupational therapy reached and practice.
对南加州感觉统合测试(SCSIT)、南加州旋转后眼震测试(SCPNT)以及这些测试所伴随的临床观察结果与耳鼻喉科、眼科和听力学评估之间的关系进行了初步调查。受试者为两名患有前庭功能障碍性感觉统合失调的儿童。结果显示,SCPNT的结果与耳鼻喉科评估结果之间没有一致性。眼科评估与SCSIT所伴随的临床观察结果之间存在一定的一致性。两名受试者在听觉处理的两个方面得分都很低。文中讨论了这些结果的可能原因以及对职业治疗的影响和实践。