Koomar J A, Cermak S A
Am J Occup Ther. 1981 Jul;35(7):456-63. doi: 10.5014/ajot.35.7.456.
This study was designed to establish test-retest reliability of the consonant vowel and digit formats of the dichotic listening test with normal and learning-disabled children between the ages of 7 and 10 years. Between-group differences on ear advantage and total accuracy scores were also examined. The results indicated that both groups showed a right ear advantage and that there were no significant differences in ear advantage between the two groups on either format. However, on the digit format, the learning-disabled group performed significantly lower than the normal group on both the percentage of total accuracy and the left ear raw score. There were no significant differences between the two groups on percentage of total accuracy or raw ear scores on the consonant vowel format. The normal group tended to obtain higher reliability coefficients than he learning-disabled group. Both groups tended to obtain higher reliability on the consonant vowel format than on the digit format. Wide variability in reliability results was found when using different laterality formulas to determine ear advantage.
本研究旨在确定7至10岁正常儿童和学习障碍儿童在双耳分听测试中,辅音元音和数字形式的重测信度。同时也考察了两组在耳优势和总准确率得分上的组间差异。结果表明,两组均表现出右耳优势,且在两种形式下两组之间的耳优势均无显著差异。然而,在数字形式测试中,学习障碍组在总准确率百分比和左耳原始得分上均显著低于正常组。在辅音元音形式测试中,两组在总准确率百分比或原始耳得分上均无显著差异。正常组的信度系数往往高于学习障碍组。两组在辅音元音形式测试中的信度往往高于数字形式测试。在使用不同的偏侧公式来确定耳优势时,发现信度结果存在很大差异。