• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[颈动脉沟迷走神经孤立性肿瘤:神经纤维瘤和神经鞘瘤。附2例报告]

[Solitary tumors of the vagus nerve in the carotid sulcus: neurofibroma and schwannoma. Apropos of 2 cases].

作者信息

Le Mouel C, Angot A, Daurel P, Verdier M, Renon P, Suc B

出版信息

Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac. 1980 Dec;97(12):1035-45.

PMID:7247209
Abstract

Neurinoma of the vagus is a rare disease (less than a hundred cases published) and even more exceptional when it develops in the carotid cervical sulcus. Indeed, nevous tumors of the neck are usually situated in a high position, in the lateo-pharyngeal space. Clinical diagnosis is difficult: a chronical enlarged lymph node is the usual suggestion. Nevertheless, two signs, albeit inconsistent are very important: cough and bradycardia on palpation of the tumefaction. Enucleation, when possible, is the best procedure for exeresis, leaving the recurrent fibers intact. But in most cases, the tumor cannot be separated from the nervous fibers and the vagus nerve must be severed at both ends. This results in definitive paralysis of the homolateral vocal cord. Microscopically, it is not always easy to distinguish between neurofibroma and schwannoma because both tumors share a common cytogenetic origin and many intermediary forms are found. Only electronic microscopy can solve litigious cases. The importance of this distinction is not only speculative, a schwannoma assumes a solitary course but a neurofibroma may belong to Recklinghausen's disease. Both schwannoma and the rare solitary neurofibroma of the cervical portion of the vagus nerve can be surgically removed, their prognosis is favorable. nervous tumors of the neck in Recklinghausen's Disease must not be operated on account of possible aggravation.

摘要

迷走神经神经鞘瘤是一种罕见疾病(已发表病例不到100例),当其发生于颈动脉颈段沟时更为罕见。实际上,颈部神经肿瘤通常位于高位,即咽外侧间隙。临床诊断困难:通常提示为慢性肿大淋巴结。然而,有两个体征虽不恒定但非常重要:触诊肿物时出现咳嗽和心动过缓。若有可能,摘除术是切除的最佳方法,保留返神经纤维完整。但在大多数情况下,肿瘤无法与神经纤维分离,必须在两端切断迷走神经。这会导致同侧声带永久性麻痹。在显微镜下,区分神经纤维瘤和神经鞘瘤并不总是容易的,因为这两种肿瘤有共同的细胞遗传学起源,且发现有许多中间形式。只有电子显微镜能解决有争议的病例。这种区分的重要性不仅是理论上的,神经鞘瘤病程单一,但神经纤维瘤可能属于冯雷克林霍增氏病。迷走神经颈段的神经鞘瘤和罕见的孤立性神经纤维瘤都可通过手术切除,其预后良好。冯雷克林霍增氏病患者颈部的神经肿瘤因可能加重病情而不应进行手术。

相似文献

1
[Solitary tumors of the vagus nerve in the carotid sulcus: neurofibroma and schwannoma. Apropos of 2 cases].[颈动脉沟迷走神经孤立性肿瘤:神经纤维瘤和神经鞘瘤。附2例报告]
Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac. 1980 Dec;97(12):1035-45.
2
[Schwannoma and neurofibroma of the neck].[颈部的施万细胞瘤和神经纤维瘤]
HNO. 1988 Nov;36(11):437-44.
3
[Neurinoma of the vagus nerve. Description of 2 cases and review of the literature].
G Chir. 1998 Jan-Feb;19(1-2):31-4.
4
Malignant transformation of an intrathoracic neurofibroma in von Recklinghausen's disease.冯雷克林霍增氏病(神经纤维瘤病)中胸内神经纤维瘤的恶性转化
Scand Cardiovasc J. 1998;32(3):173-5. doi: 10.1080/14017439850140157.
5
Neurogenic tumors of the cervical vagus nerve: report of four cases and review of the literature.颈迷走神经源性肿瘤:4例报告并文献复习
Neurosurgery. 2000 Jun;46(6):1498-503. doi: 10.1097/00006123-200006000-00036.
6
[Neurogenic tumor of the anterior mediastinum. An uncommon diagnosis: neurofibroma of the vagus].[前纵隔神经源性肿瘤。一种罕见的诊断:迷走神经神经纤维瘤]
Ann Med Interne (Paris). 1983;134(2):134-8.
7
Schwannoma of the cervical vagus nerve.颈迷走神经鞘瘤
Pediatr Neurosurg. 2007;43(5):403-5. doi: 10.1159/000106391.
8
[Neurofibroma originated from the intrathoracic vagal nerve in a patient with von Recklinghausen's disease--a case report].[1例冯·雷克林霍增氏病患者起源于胸段迷走神经的神经纤维瘤——病例报告]
Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 1990 Jul;38(7):1188-91.
9
[Facial nerve tumors: three cases (author's transl)].
Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac. 1978 Dec;95(12):777-84.
10
[Differential diagnosis of parapharyngeal tumors--the vagus neurinoma].
Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg). 1988 Aug;67(8):389-91.