Singer M T, Larson D G
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1981 Jun;38(6):693-8. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1981.01780310093010.
Rorschach responses of borderline persons, acute and chronic schizophrenics, normals, and neurotics were compared on summary, composite, and fabulized combination scores and on a score reflecting decline in the quality of responses to individual cards. The groups' summary scores were as ego function theory would predict; normals had the highest scores, followed by neurotics, borderline persons, acute schizophrenics, and chronic schizophrenics. In a three-group comparison, discriminant-function analysis correctly classified most of the borderline and acute and chronic schizophrenic subjects. In a two-group comparison, stepwise regression analysis correctly classified most of the borderline and acute schizophrenic subjects. The borderline persons tended to produce more fabulized combination responses and show a greater decline in response quality on each card. The associative drift and sporadic reasoning problems imputed to borderline persons clinically distinguished the borderline sample's Rorschach records.
对边缘型人格障碍患者、急性和慢性精神分裂症患者、正常人以及神经症患者的罗夏测验反应进行了比较，比较内容包括概括分数、综合分数和虚构组合分数，以及反映对各张卡片反应质量下降的分数。各组的概括分数正如自我功能理论所预测的那样；正常人得分最高，其次是神经症患者、边缘型人格障碍患者、急性精神分裂症患者和慢性精神分裂症患者。在三组比较中，判别函数分析正确地将大多数边缘型人格障碍患者以及急性和慢性精神分裂症患者进行了分类。在两组比较中，逐步回归分析正确地将大多数边缘型人格障碍患者和急性精神分裂症患者进行了分类。边缘型人格障碍患者倾向于产生更多的虚构组合反应，并且在每张卡片上的反应质量下降幅度更大。临床上归因于边缘型人格障碍患者的联想漂移和偶发性推理问题在边缘型人格障碍样本的罗夏测验记录中具有显著特征。
