• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Permanent pacemaker implantation in patients over 80 years of age.

作者信息

Matsuura Y, Tamura M, Yamashina H, Higo M

出版信息

Artif Organs. 1981 Feb;5(1):82-5.

PMID:7247761
Abstract

During the past five years, 150 pacemaker implantations have been done at Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital for the treatment of atrioventricular block, sick sinus syndrome, or slow heartbeat with atrial fibrillation. The patients were divided into two groups by age: the older group of 18 patients over 80 years of age and the younger group of 132 patients under 79 years of age. A comparative study of these two groups was undertaken with respect to pre- and postoperative courses, underlying diseases, cardiac output at variable pacing rate, capture threshold, and prognosis. The older group has as satisfactory a course as the younger group. Seventeen patients out of 18 (94%) in the older group are leading normal productive lives at this writing, and 119 out of 132 (89%) in the younger group are also doing well. In the light of this five-year comparative study, it can be concluded that it is safe and rewarding to implant prosthetic cardiac pacemakers in symptomatic patients over 80 years of age.

摘要

相似文献

1
Permanent pacemaker implantation in patients over 80 years of age.
Artif Organs. 1981 Feb;5(1):82-5.
2
Pacemaker implantation in Singapore in 1997.1997年在新加坡植入起搏器。
Singapore Med J. 1999 Dec;40(12):745-8.
3
Electrophysiological determinants of atrial fibrillation in sinus node dysfunction despite atrial pacing.尽管进行了心房起搏,窦房结功能障碍时心房颤动的电生理决定因素。
Europace. 2000 Oct;2(4):304-11. doi: 10.1053/eupc.2000.0118.
4
Acquired atrioventricular block in a patient with sinus node disease on single-chamber atrial pacing.单腔心房起搏的窦房结疾病患者发生获得性房室传导阻滞。
Indian Heart J. 2002 Jul-Aug;54(4):435-6.
5
Single chamber atrial pacing: a realistic option in sinus node disease: a long-term follow-up study of 213 patients.单腔心房起搏:窦房结疾病的一种现实选择:对213例患者的长期随访研究
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2007 Jun;30(6):740-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00744.x.
6
[Sick sinus syndrome. Pacemaker with atrial versus ventricular stimulation].
Ugeskr Laeger. 1996 Feb 19;158(8):1062-7.
7
Prognosis in cardiac pacing. A comparison between patients with atrioventricular block and sick sinus syndrome.心脏起搏的预后。房室传导阻滞患者与病态窦房结综合征患者的比较。
Acta Med Scand. 1981;210(1-2):47-52.
8
[Auricular fibrillation and stroke in patients with sick sinus syndromeusing permanent pacemakers].[使用永久起搏器的病态窦房结综合征患者的心房颤动与卒中]
Rev Esp Cardiol. 1996 Jul;49(7):492-500.
9
[DDD versus DDDR pacemaker stimulation: comparison of cardiopulmonary performance, incidence of atrial arrhythmias and quality of life].[DDD与DDDR起搏器刺激:心肺功能、房性心律失常发生率及生活质量的比较]
Z Kardiol. 1996 Apr;85(4):226-36.
10
[Survival and outcome after pacemaker implantation. Comparison of patients with sinus node syndrome, AV block and absolute bradyarrhythmia].[起搏器植入后的生存情况及预后。窦房结综合征、房室传导阻滞和绝对缓慢性心律失常患者的比较]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1983 Mar 4;108(9):331-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1069551.