Ingle D J
Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc. 1978 Oct;41(4):10-3.
This discussion of the nature of human freedom supports the common-sense view of conscious self-determination. The capacity for self-determination is expanded by knowledge and should be optimal among medical scientists, but many such have been passive when faced by increased restrictions on inquiry. Restrictions should be guided by medical ethics defined in major part by physicians and medical scientists. They are urged to protect their freedoms more actively.
对人类自由本质的这一讨论支持了有意识的自我决定的常识性观点。自我决定的能力会因知识而得到拓展，在医学科学家当中这种能力应该是最佳的，但许多医学科学家在面对研究受到越来越多限制时却一直很被动。限制应该由主要由医生和医学科学家界定的医学伦理来指导。敦促他们更积极地保护自己的自由。
