Parker A J, Docker M F, Davies P, Newton J R
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1981 Jul;88(7):734-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1981.tb01275.x.
Comparison of the reproducibility of fetal crown rump length measurements (CRL) obtained in a resting state by sonar with a phase focused linear array real time scanner, a real time mechanical sector scanner, and a static B-scanner did not show any significant differences between machines. Maternal movement was found to produce a change in fetal intrauterine position and to induce fetal movement. Examination following maternal movement was felt to be more representative of clinical conditions and produced greater variability of CRL measurement, shown by all machines to a differing extent, although the differences between machines were not substantial. There is some evidence that the discernment of fetal movement and the quality of fetal echoes obtained with different machines affects the reproducibility of CRL measurement. Thus variability of CRL measurement with every machine is small in terms of gestational age and justifies the use of real time machines to establish gestational age.
使用相控阵实时线性阵列扫描仪、实时机械扇形扫描仪和静态B型扫描仪在静止状态下通过超声测量胎儿头臀长度(CRL),比较各仪器之间的重复性,结果显示各仪器之间无显著差异。发现母体运动可导致胎儿宫内位置改变并引起胎儿运动。母体运动后的检查被认为更能代表临床情况,并且CRL测量的变异性更大,所有仪器均不同程度地显示了这一点,尽管仪器之间的差异并不显著。有证据表明,不同仪器对胎儿运动的辨别以及所获得的胎儿回声质量会影响CRL测量的重复性。因此,就孕周而言,各仪器CRL测量的变异性较小,这证明使用实时仪器确定孕周是合理的。